Skip to main content

"Nobody talks about happiness"

 Peter Gumbel, lecturer in the school of journalism, Sciences Po.   Photo: Lea Crespi for the Observer

Interesting piece in today's Observer newspaper, drawing on a book published this week by British lecturer and journalist Peter Gumbel who works at Sciences Po in Paris. His book entitled On achève bien les écoliers? (Grasset) attacks the French education system for failing to build the self-esteem of French children. Nobody seems to talk about the happiness of children in schools. Whilst he agrees that the system has avoided "dumbing down" (unlike, he claims, the British system), it has been too negative towards children and makes them feel they are useless. French schoolchildren feel anxious, stressed and are frightened to speak out in class for fear of looking silly. He also mentions how poorly France trains its teachers (see my previous post) and seems to have forgotten that the basis of any good school is good teachers.

Anyway, here's the piece. Worth a look.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/05/french-schools-pupils-feel-worthless

I guess it's hard to make a judgement on this as a virtual outsider, though his conclusions do not surprise me a bit. Pastoral support is not as well developed as in the UK, the curriculum encourages a "mug and jug" approach ("un style magistral"), extra-curricular activities are relatively limited, teachers are poorly trained and pressures on children are high. Teachers often complain that their schemes of work are "surchargés". Just as we are obsessed by our targets, league tables and grades, the French still over-value the mark out of 20 and the "moyenne". On the other hard, accountability is very limited when compared to the British system. If French teachers had to deal with our performance management system they would go on strike even before a hat was dropped.

And it's not as if standards are especially high. Despite what it says in the Observer article, international comparisons, for what they are worth, are not very flattering for the French.

Looks like the Observer and the Nouvel Obs are the only publications to latch on to this story so far. For more detail and comments see:

http://hebdo.nouvelobs.com/sommaire/notre-epoque/100417/l-ecole-casse-t-elle-nos-enfants.html

Are countries introspective when it comes to their education systems? We could learn so much from each other.

Comments

  1. This is so very true for colleges and lycees (maybe not for primary school). I witnessed year after year how my absolutely self-confident, articulate nine year old turns into a vegetable in his atrocious (but good) school. And the teachers were competent in their "matieres" but either old and cranky and distributing punishement instead of teaching, or young and unhappy and just unable to cope.

    And this year, his last, thankfully, the new "proviseurs" greeted them with menaces of what they cannot do. Not a single word of encouragement and welcome back after vacation. Sickening, really.

    As a historian and resercher myself I was just amused at the methodology of one half-mad teacher and her "textes a trous" that we filled in for hours without even knowing what we were reading. The punishement for not completing this completely futile exercise was 0. Those 0s destroyed my son's motivation for history.

    There are always shining exceptions (my son's German teachers) but they are so rare that one wonders how are they possible at all.

    Well, however, this system also builts character, but I wonder it is the one we want to dominate the next half a century.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Are countries introspective when it comes to their own education system?" A good question indeed... Often foreigners who have come to live and to love a country are able to have the needed insight to comment so aptly. A good illustration is Theodore Zeldin and his "The French" in particular. As a French teacher of FLE abroad I will endeavour to read Gumbel and expect to find there fluffy thoughts of mine articulated and substantiated eloquently and expertly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'd also like to read his book, though when I checked it out on Amazon it looked horribly expensive.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,