Skip to main content

£1 million paid to headteacher in four years

As the Outwood Academies group of schools is set to encompass two local secondaries: Harrogate High School and Ripon College, I found this piece in today's Guardian interesting.

"An investigation is under way after it emerged that more than £1m of public funds have been spent on the services of a single headteacher over the course of four years. Michael Wilkins earns £182,000 a year as principal of Outwood Grange academy in Wakefield, but since April 2007 he has also been paid £497,400 for helping to improve other schools in the area. Most of this sum has been paid into a private consultancy company, which is run by Wilkins, two school governors and two other members of staff.
In addition, according to the Yorkshire Post, £148,637 has gone into another private company owned by Wilkins – Leadership Challenge Ltd.

Wakefield council is investigating whether the correct procedures were followed when making the payments. Bernadette Livesey, the council's director of legal and democratic services, says the authority is doing "all we should to pursue this issue".

She says: "As a responsible council, we strongly believe that the use of public money should be open and transparent. The council has been in regular contact with representatives of the Outwood Grange academy and it is hoped that the matter will be finalised in the near future. At this stage of the process, the council is not in a position to make further comment on the status of the review."

A spokesman for Wilkins has told the Yorkshire Post that the head generated more than £1m for his school and made year-on-year efficiency savings that covered his salary several times over.
Michael Gove, the education secretary, last month named Wilkins as one of the country's "great school leaders" at a national conference of directors of children's and adult services.
The payments Wilkins is reported to have received come as schools across the country receive their budgets for the financial year starting on 1 April. Cuts to local authority budgets and reductions to central government education grants will mean many schools are worse off.
The Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), which represents 15,000 heads and deputies, has said some heads are preparing to make up to a fifth of their staff redundant in anticipation of huge cuts.
Fiona Millar, a campaigner for state education and former government adviser, says helping challenging schools is important work, but questions whether "individual heads should be able to profit to such an extent, expecially if salaries for their day jobs are set at such a high level".

She adds: "Should the profits from this work, all paid for by the taxpayer, be ploughed back into one school, or a group of schools, or should it come back to the Department for Education to be shared among all schools?
"It seems quite wrong that, at a time when many schools are agonising over how to shave thousands of pounds off their budgets without making staff redundant, other schools, their heads, or executives at academy chains, should be benefiting to such an extent."
Sally Kincaid, divisional secretary of the Wakefield branch of the National Union of Teachers, says these payments show there is "no local, democratic accountability within academies".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,