Skip to main content

A reflection on controlled assessments

Well, it's nearly the end of the first classes going through the new controlled assessments for GCSE and my thoughts on this are thus:

Overall, not too painful for teachers or students. We have given (in nearly all cases) our pupils three goes at speaking assessments, after initially planning for four. The first we did at the end of Y10 during gained time when we were able to get cover. The second oral CA was during the December mocks in Y11 and the last one is coming up in very early May, just before the deadline. Again we have managed to secure cover for them. We chose tried and tested topics: school, food and healthy eating, holidays and free time (depending on the class). We tried to choose topics which fitted in chronologically with our existing scheme. I couldn't see the point in going for more original topics. My feeling was that we can do more creative things outside the assessment system and that the safe topics would score good marks.

Marking the spoken CAs has been time-consuming, especially in view of the amount of moderation needed to get the marking right. We have had three lengthy twilight sessions listening to sound files and tweaking marks. Those sessions can be amusing and not at all dull, but they take time. We have learned that it takes a while to mark accurately. We were too fierce to start with. We found it useful, as experienced teachers, to consider roughly what grade we thought a tests merited. We have a good idea of what  C grade sounds like and what and A* sounds like. This influenced us to some extent when interpreting the mark scheme. Overall, we found it easy enough to use the mark scheme.

I still feel that the new format involves too much learning by heart, but the results produced by the AQA's mark scheme seem about right and pupils have prepared well for the tests on the whole. The best students have excellent memories so perform well, the less able dry up more and get the mark they deserve. Those who do not prepare thoroughly also get what they deserve. Some students got nervous, but I had the feeling that there were fewer nerves than with the old "one off" test.

As for the written assessments, we have done just two timed essays, one on free time and one on fitness and health. We decided not to feed back marks to students, but to just inform them if we thought their mark was below expectation. In these cases students have been happy to have a second go. A few have actually requested it. We did these essays in the spring term of Y11. We did not wish to clutter up the Y10 scheme of work with endless assessments. This has worked fine and I cannot see us changing next time. It also meant that we did not allow spoken CAs and written CAs to overlap. Spanish and German happily worked around the French, but essentially followed the same format, with similar topics.

We have learned that preparation is best done at home after a teaching sequence of about three weeks. Preparation in class is fraught with difficulties: lack of concentration, doubts about what information can be shared and the vexed issue of not being allowed to take drafts home.We hand out bullet points a week before the CA and treat it as an extended homework.

The only change in our practice I can envisage at this moment would be not to leave the final spoken CA quite so late, just before the deadline for sending in marks.

The serious issue with all this, in my view, is the one of assessment reliability. We cannot control what help is given at home, we cannot stop students using Google Translate and the system allows teachers to bend the rules too easily. With regard to re-sits, for example, the fact that you can create a new task by changing just one bullet point means, effectively, that the students can write the same essay again. (Bear in mind that the instructions say "you may include" ahead of the bullet points.) I daresay most teachers are scrupulously fair about the conduct of assessments, but the system almost invites malpractice and therefore fails the primary test of an assessment system: reliability.

For that reason alone, I would favour a return to an examination.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

A zero preparation fluency game

I am grateful to Kayleigh Meyrick, a teacher in Sheffield, for this game which she described in the Languages Today magazine (January, 2018). She called it “Swap It/Add It” and it’s dead simple! I’ve added my own little twist as well as a justification for the activity.

You could use this at almost any level, even advanced level where the language could get a good deal more sophisticated.

Put students into small groups or pairs. If in groups you can have them stand in circles to add a sense of occasion. One student utters a sentence, e.g. “J’aime jouer au foot avec mes copains parce que c’est amusant.” (You could provide the starter sentence or let groups make up their own.) The next student (or partner) has to change one element in the sentence, and so on, until you restart with a different sentence. You could give a time limit of, say, 2 minutes. The sentence could easily relate to the topic you are working on. At advanced level a suitable sentence starter might be:

“Selon un article q…

Google Translate beaters

Google Translate is a really useful tool, but some teachers say that they have stopped setting written work to be done at home because students are cheating by using it. On a number of occasions I have seen teachers asking what tasks can be set which make the use of Google Translate hard or impossible. Having given this some thought I have come up with one possible Google Translate-beating task type. It's a two way gapped translation exercise where students have to complete gaps in two parallel texts, one in French, one in English. There are no complete sentences which can be copied and pasted into Google.

This is what one looks like. Remember to hand out both texts at the same time.


English 

_____. My name is David. _ __ 15 years old and I live in Ripon, a _____ ____ in the north of _______, near York. I have two _______ and one brother. My brother __ ______ David and my _______ are called Erika and Claire. We live in a _____ house in the centre of ____. In ___ house _____ …

Dissecting a lesson: using a set of PowerPoint slides

I was prompted to write this just having produced for frenchteacher.net three separate PowerPoint presentations using the same set of 20 pictures (sports). A very good way for you to save time is to reuse the same resource in a number of different ways.

I chose 20 clear, simple, clear and copyright-free images from pixabay.com to produce three presentations on present tense (beginners), near future (post beginner) and perfect tense (post-beginner/low intermediate). Here is one of them:





Below is how I would have taught using this presentation - it won't be everyone's cup of tea, especially of you are not big on choral repetition and PPP (Presentation-Practice-Production), but I'll justify my choice in the plan at each stage. For some readers this will be standard practice.

1. Explain in English that you are going to teach the class how to talk about and understand people talking about sport. By the end of the lesson they will be able to say and understand 20 different sport…

Two ways to build in recycling: Intensive input-output work and narrow reading

We know repetition is vital for acquisition so we need to work it into lesson planning. There are various ways to do this when reading and listening. “Narrow reading” and “narrow listening” are useful, for example. Stephen Krashen first coined these terms and suggested that exposing students to a series of similar spoken or written sources of input was an effective way to promote acquisition. (His version was much less structured than what will be described below.) Text books often include a series of paragraphs featuring some vocabulary or structures in common to ensure repetition. Gianfranco Conti has turned this into a fine art with highly patterned sets of paragraphs including large amounts of repetition. We adopted this technique for our TES GCSE French units of work. Here are four French paragraphs where you see the technique in use. Repeated chunks are shown in bold.