Skip to main content

A reflection on controlled assessments

Well, it's nearly the end of the first classes going through the new controlled assessments for GCSE and my thoughts on this are thus:

Overall, not too painful for teachers or students. We have given (in nearly all cases) our pupils three goes at speaking assessments, after initially planning for four. The first we did at the end of Y10 during gained time when we were able to get cover. The second oral CA was during the December mocks in Y11 and the last one is coming up in very early May, just before the deadline. Again we have managed to secure cover for them. We chose tried and tested topics: school, food and healthy eating, holidays and free time (depending on the class). We tried to choose topics which fitted in chronologically with our existing scheme. I couldn't see the point in going for more original topics. My feeling was that we can do more creative things outside the assessment system and that the safe topics would score good marks.

Marking the spoken CAs has been time-consuming, especially in view of the amount of moderation needed to get the marking right. We have had three lengthy twilight sessions listening to sound files and tweaking marks. Those sessions can be amusing and not at all dull, but they take time. We have learned that it takes a while to mark accurately. We were too fierce to start with. We found it useful, as experienced teachers, to consider roughly what grade we thought a tests merited. We have a good idea of what  C grade sounds like and what and A* sounds like. This influenced us to some extent when interpreting the mark scheme. Overall, we found it easy enough to use the mark scheme.

I still feel that the new format involves too much learning by heart, but the results produced by the AQA's mark scheme seem about right and pupils have prepared well for the tests on the whole. The best students have excellent memories so perform well, the less able dry up more and get the mark they deserve. Those who do not prepare thoroughly also get what they deserve. Some students got nervous, but I had the feeling that there were fewer nerves than with the old "one off" test.

As for the written assessments, we have done just two timed essays, one on free time and one on fitness and health. We decided not to feed back marks to students, but to just inform them if we thought their mark was below expectation. In these cases students have been happy to have a second go. A few have actually requested it. We did these essays in the spring term of Y11. We did not wish to clutter up the Y10 scheme of work with endless assessments. This has worked fine and I cannot see us changing next time. It also meant that we did not allow spoken CAs and written CAs to overlap. Spanish and German happily worked around the French, but essentially followed the same format, with similar topics.

We have learned that preparation is best done at home after a teaching sequence of about three weeks. Preparation in class is fraught with difficulties: lack of concentration, doubts about what information can be shared and the vexed issue of not being allowed to take drafts home.We hand out bullet points a week before the CA and treat it as an extended homework.

The only change in our practice I can envisage at this moment would be not to leave the final spoken CA quite so late, just before the deadline for sending in marks.

The serious issue with all this, in my view, is the one of assessment reliability. We cannot control what help is given at home, we cannot stop students using Google Translate and the system allows teachers to bend the rules too easily. With regard to re-sits, for example, the fact that you can create a new task by changing just one bullet point means, effectively, that the students can write the same essay again. (Bear in mind that the instructions say "you may include" ahead of the bullet points.) I daresay most teachers are scrupulously fair about the conduct of assessments, but the system almost invites malpractice and therefore fails the primary test of an assessment system: reliability.

For that reason alone, I would favour a return to an examination.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Sentence Stealers with a twist

Sentence Stealers is a reading aloud game invented by Gianfranco Conti. I'll describe the game to you, then suggest an extension of it which goes a bit further than reading aloud. By the way, I shouldn't need to justify the usefulness of reading aloud, but just in case, we are talking here about matching sounds to spellings, practising listening, pronunciation and intonation and repeating/recycling high frequency language patterns.

This is how it works:

Display around 15 sentences on the board, preferably ones which show language patterns you have been working on recently or some time ago.Hand out four cards or slips of paper to each student.On each card students must secretly write a sentence from the displayed list.Students then circulate around the class, approaching their classmates and reading a sentence from the displayed list. If the other person has that sentence on one of their cards, they must hand over the card. The other person then does the same, choosing a sentenc…

Using sentence builder frames for GCSE speaking and writing preparation

Some teachers have cottoned on to the fact that sentence builders (aka substitution tables) are a very useful tool for helping students prepare for their GCSE speaking and writing tests. My own hunch is that would help for students of all levels of proficiency, but may be particularly helpful for those likely to get lower grades, say between 3-6. Much depends, of course, on how complex you make the table.

To remind you, here is a typical sentence builder, as found on the frenchteacher site. The topic is talking about where you live. A word of warning - formatting blogs in Blogger is a nightmare when you start with Word documents, so apologies for any issues. It might have taken me another 30 minutes just to sort out the html code underlying the original document.


Setting work for home study

A major challenge for language teachers just now is selecting and sharing work with students to do at home. Here a few suggestions on the issue to add to your own. The sites I mention are the tip of the iceberg and focus mainly on French. I have stuck to free resources, not subscription sites.

By the way, I'm not getting into the use of tech here, as I have no great expertise on that. In any case, I imagine for younger learners especially it may be a question of setting other types of work.

ADVANCED

For advanced learners the job is not so tough. There is a plethora of listening, reading and grammar material they can use, whether it be from their textbooks, other resources shared electronically or online resources. You may have your favourites, but for a selection for French you can check out my links here and here. You may want to stick with topics on the syllabus, or free up students to read and listen more generally to what interests them.

One idea I used was to ask students to c…

"Ask and move" task

This is a lesson plan using an idea from our book Breaking the Sound Barrier (Conti and Smith, 2019). It's a task-based lesson adapted from an idea from Paul Nation and Jonathan Newton. It is aimed at Y10-11 pupils aiming at Higher Tier GCSE, but is easily adaptable to other levels and languages, including A-level. This has been posted as a resource on frenchteacher.net.

This type of lesson plan excites me more than many, because if it runs well, you get a classroom of busy communication when you can step back, monitor and occasionally intervene as students get on with listening, speaking and writing.