Skip to main content

Speaky

I downloaded the Speaky app from the Apple  store to see what it does. It is currently free but may soon come at a small charge. It is one of a number of text-to-speech apps; others are reviewed here.

Essentially it is text-to-speech tool which reads out texts in very acceptable French. Lots of other languages are available. You can type in your own text, copy and paste text or just enter a URL for a site in French. Speaky recognises the language from the text and will give you pronunciation options ("standard" or Canadian French). In each case the text is read aloud for the user with the speed of delivery being adjustable. As is typical with text-to-speech tools the intonation is not entirely natural, but nor does it sound unacceptably artificial. The accent is excellent.

Who could use this? Well, I certainly had pupils who would write out text for their oral controlled assessment into text-to-speech sites so that they could practise by hearing a good spoken model. This does just the same, but in a rather more convenient fashion for iPad and iPhone. Teachers working with iPads might find use for this, especially if pupils have headphones for personal listening.

Other learners, for example adults doing continuing education, would also find use for the app in terms of improving their pronunciation, or helping them prepare for oral presentations.

In addition, teachers could produce listening exercises from approprate written texts. Just copy in the text, produce a comprehension worksheet and off you go!

Users who are blind or who have poor vision would also find such an app extremely useful and for this reason alone the app deserves a solid recommendation.

 I would recommend it for teachers using iPads too. It comes with a few pages of simple tutorial. When I used it initially I got stuck as I did not spot the small cross at the top right of the "Let's get started" screen. You have to select this to start adding text. Maybe it could have been made more prominent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,