Skip to main content

Principles for resource writing

Like many of you no doubt, I have been writing resources for language teachers (French) for many years. Although I have always used my instincts about what is useful I've never established a set of explicit principles on which to base my resources. In fact, these principles have existed implicitly in my head but I've never written them down.

Anyway, having just read a blog on the MaWSIG (IATEFL) site here by freelance ELT author Katherine Bilsborough, I've been prompted to give this some thought. In her blog post she discusses materials writing principles and refers to a number of ELT writers who have worked on this, such as Rod Ellis (second language acquisition research guru) Paul Nation (vocabulary research guru) and Brian Tomlinson (all round guru).

Of the various principles outlined for resource writing I liked these by Brian Tomlinson. See what you think:
  • Provide a rich, meaningful and recycled exposure to the target language in use.
  • Stimulate affective engagement.
  • Stimulate cognitive engagement.
  • Provide opportunities for noticing and discovering how language features and strategies are used to achieve intended effects.
  • Provide opportunities to use the target language in order to achieve communicative effects.
These make total sense to me. In terms of my own resources I would add just one more principle of my own:
  • Make the resources relevant, where necessary, to the examination syllabus.
For me, some corrolaries of these principles include:
  1. Tend to minimise the amount of L1 (e.g. English) since including L1 lowers the amount of exposure to meaningful input. Therefore, I would usually avoid questions in English where alternatives are possible. I would tend avoid translation into English and include it mainly where practice is required for an examination., e.g. GCSE or A-level. 
  2. Be prepared to produce drill-based worksheets to encourage noticing and internalisation (automatisation) of patterns or rules. But endeavour to make these as stimulating as possible, either through their content (e.g. personalisation) or their delivery (e.g. using humour, pace, varied types of interaction with the class).
  3. Choose subject matter which is already of interest to the learners or, importantly, which can form the basis of a new interest. Since we are not just language teachers, but teachers, we need not avoid opening students' minds to new and interesting areas. Often the subject matter will be of interest to the teacher who can communicate their enthusiasm about it.
  4. Don't produce superficial resources - build repetition and recycling into the resource. For example by using "narrow reading" or "narrow listening" (multiple short texts which recycle the same vocabulary or chunks), a range of different exercises on the same longer text (e.g. L2 questions, matching, gap-fill, summary, transcription, communicative tasks, sentence combining, aural gap-fill, sentence completion, oral discussion etc).
  5. In drill-based sheets include enough examples. For instance, if you were drilling the perfect tense in French (regular avoir verbs), don't do 5 examples, do at least 20. Then in a later lesson do 20 more. Some text books are short on examples and require the support of supplementary workbooks or custom-made worksheets.
  6. To ensure cognitive challenge build progression into resources, beginning with less challenging tasks (e.g. matching or multi-choice) and moving towards more challenging exercises (e.g. question-answer in L2, translation into L2). In addition, within an individual exercise, include easier and harder examples.
  7. Where possible make it possible to exploit the four skills, firstly to ensure variety, secondly to allow each skill to reinforce the others. Frequently, for example, a simple grammar drill worksheet can be exploited orally first, then in written form.

I daresay you could think of other principles and consequences of these principles. Do leave a comment!




Comments

  1. Thank you so much for this. I make a lot of resources, which I then share widely across Canada. I will print out and study this in depth.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

A zero preparation fluency game

I am grateful to Kayleigh Meyrick, a teacher in Sheffield, for this game which she described in the Languages Today magazine (January, 2018). She called it “Swap It/Add It” and it’s dead simple! I’ve added my own little twist as well as a justification for the activity.

You could use this at almost any level, even advanced level where the language could get a good deal more sophisticated.

Put students into small groups or pairs. If in groups you can have them stand in circles to add a sense of occasion. One student utters a sentence, e.g. “J’aime jouer au foot avec mes copains parce que c’est amusant.” (You could provide the starter sentence or let groups make up their own.) The next student (or partner) has to change one element in the sentence, and so on, until you restart with a different sentence. You could give a time limit of, say, 2 minutes. The sentence could easily relate to the topic you are working on. At advanced level a suitable sentence starter might be:

“Selon un article q…

Google Translate beaters

Google Translate is a really useful tool, but some teachers say that they have stopped setting written work to be done at home because students are cheating by using it. On a number of occasions I have seen teachers asking what tasks can be set which make the use of Google Translate hard or impossible. Having given this some thought I have come up with one possible Google Translate-beating task type. It's a two way gapped translation exercise where students have to complete gaps in two parallel texts, one in French, one in English. There are no complete sentences which can be copied and pasted into Google.

This is what one looks like. Remember to hand out both texts at the same time.


English 

_____. My name is David. _ __ 15 years old and I live in Ripon, a _____ ____ in the north of _______, near York. I have two _______ and one brother. My brother __ ______ David and my _______ are called Erika and Claire. We live in a _____ house in the centre of ____. In ___ house _____ …

Worried about the new GCSEs?

Twitter and MFL Facebook groups are replete with posts expressing concerns about the new GCSEs and, in particular, the difficulty of the exam, grades and tiers. I can only comment from a distance since I am no longer in the classroom, but I have been through a number of sea changes in assessment over the years so may have something useful to say.

Firstly, as far as general difficulty of papers is concerned, I think it’s fair to say that the new assessment is harder (not necessarily in terms of grades though). This is particularly evident in the writing tasks and speaking test. Although it will still be possible to work in some memorised material in these parts of the exam, there is no doubt that weaker candidates will have more problems coping with the greater requirement for unrehearsed language. Past experience working with average to very able students tells me some, even those with reasonable attainment, will flounder on the written questions in the heat of the moment. Others will…

Dissecting a lesson: using a set of PowerPoint slides

I was prompted to write this just having produced for frenchteacher.net three separate PowerPoint presentations using the same set of 20 pictures (sports). A very good way for you to save time is to reuse the same resource in a number of different ways.

I chose 20 clear, simple, clear and copyright-free images from pixabay.com to produce three presentations on present tense (beginners), near future (post beginner) and perfect tense (post-beginner/low intermediate). Here is one of them:





Below is how I would have taught using this presentation - it won't be everyone's cup of tea, especially of you are not big on choral repetition and PPP (Presentation-Practice-Production), but I'll justify my choice in the plan at each stage. For some readers this will be standard practice.

1. Explain in English that you are going to teach the class how to talk about and understand people talking about sport. By the end of the lesson they will be able to say and understand 20 different sport…