Skip to main content

Do you talk to classes about language learning?

Do you ever share with your classes what you know about how languages are learned? Do you think it would help if you did so?

I would occasionally talk with my classes about language acquisition, in particular what it has in common with child language acquisition (a great deal, I believe, and supported by research).

You might like to try it. My little homily went something like this:

“Just think how amazing it was that you learned to speak English, or your other native language, by the age of about five. You might not have had all the words and complicated grammar, but you could understand your parents and friends, and you could speak fluently, without ever having to learn rules, read much or write anything down, do vocab tests or do practice exercises. Amazing! How did that happen?

It happened because you were listening to people all the time and talking back to them. Your mum or dad probably simplified their language a bit for you, read you stories with pictures, sang songs and watched cartoons with you. You asked what things mean and they told you.

So... if you had that ability to learn a language then, do you still have it now? Yes! I know we only have X lessons a week, but if you listen carefully and join in when you can, and if you spend time on your homework, nature will take its course and you will become a better (French) speaker. I have older students who began exactly like you about six years ago and can now speak (French) quite fluently. It’s a fantastic thing to be able to do!

So... just listen to me and your friends really carefully, join in when you are confident, and you’ll do well.”

And it may nearly be that simple.




- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Comments

  1. I do, yes. Regularly. Especially about the importance of using the language. I also stress the importance of vocabulary building (top 2,000 by frequency) and ways of learning it: flashcards, spaced repetition, mini-text floods, e.g. reading a load of amazon comments about s book or film or album that they have loved or hated. Every wer bit helps!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics