Skip to main content

Book review: Second Language Acquisition in Action: Principles from Practice (2018)

This book, aimed at language teachers either in training or those wishing to further their knowledge, is written by Andrea Nava and Luciana Pedrazzini who teach English and Second Language Acquisition at the University of Milan. It is a detailed account of some of the "big themes" in classroom second language acquisition, presented alongside examples of lesson extracts and videos of teachers at work (on an accompanying website).

Areas covered in the six main chapters are form, meaning and use; comprehensible input; input processing; implicit and explicit knowledge; interaction and corrective feedback and output production. Each concept is clearly explained with reference to the main research sources, then put in a classroom context with examples of teacher-pupil interactions, lesson ideas and discussion questions to consider.

The clarity of the exposition is admirable, with each area being described and critically analysed. There is something of a chronological feel to the book as the discussion ranges from the the role of input (Krashen) through to Input Processing (VanPatten), to output (Swain) and eventually to Task-Based Learning (Ellis, Long, Willis and Willis). The discussion never becomes too erudite (at least for me), though some teachers might find it goes too far for their taste.

I found the chapter on Input Processing among the more practical, with its examples of how to frame exercises to make features more salient than others. The final chapter on task-based teaching also gets into the detail of how to design tasks to generate practice of the lexicogrammatical features you want to focus on. Teachers might find topics such as the precise definition of what is a "task" a little unnecessary. But this is just a reflection of what's in the research literature and there is no doubting that the authors are very well-informed.

This is not a "grab-and-go" book with loads of ready-made activities to take away and implement, but it does provide some sound underpinnings to any teacher's thinking and practice. I was able to supplement my existing knowledge with plenty of new information Never does the book become polemical and you are left with a clear idea of where the current consensus (if there is one) lies: input is paramount, but explicit learning and output have a strong role to play. Overall: recommended, but get the print copy if you can. The number of tables makes the use of a Kindle awkward.

The book is published by Bloomsbury and is available on Amazon.

Here is the video clip companion website:

https://www.bloomsbury.com/cw/second-language-acquisition-in-action/video-clips/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g