Skip to main content

Detectives and Informants



Here's a communicative lesson plan which Gianfranco Conti shared with me recently. It's a listening/speaking/writing information gap task called Detectives and Informants. It could work from about Y9 up, depending on the class. This is how it works.


Write five short paragraphs, each of which provides some (but not all) information about someone. When combined the five paragraphs describe that person. Include personal information, likes and dislikes, pastimes, favourite school subjects, family and friends. Hand out a copy of each paragraph to five students (‘informants’) in the class. To the remaining students (‘detectives’) hand out the same set of questions to ask, e.g. What is her name? Does she have brothers and sisters? What are her favourite hobbies? What’s her favourite subject? Make sure the questions correspond to the information contained in the five paragraphs.
Explain that detectives have to find all the information they can about the subject and that they can ask the five informants. The detectives should keep a careful note of the answers. You could supply a grid for this purpose.
Having placed the five informants strategically around the room, allow the remainder to move around, asking them questions. Groups are bound to form around each informant. This is fine, as long as everyone is listening. Students take notes, preferably in L2. Make sure the detectives aren't just copying from the informants' written texts!
Finally, elicit information from the detectives, writing up language on the board which students can copy. This can be the basis of a written composition.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,
4 comments
Read more

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g
2 comments
Read more