Skip to main content

Treasured possession

Do you have a treasured possession? A piece of jewelry? A photo? Your phone? Your cat?

I came across this nice little lesson idea from Sara-Elizabeth Cottrell's blog which would make a good ice-breaker and 'get to know you' with an advanced level class. The idea is that each student brings in a "treasured possession" to talk about. If they don't have such a thing, they could bring in any interesting item from home. Encourage students to choose something which suggests a story or experience.

You'd ask them to talk very briefly about it, say no more than a minute. Students will probably want to script that part. You could suggest they describe it, how they came across it and why it's important to them, waht event is associated in their minds with it.

After the brief introduction you and other class members could ask questions about it and explore why some items mean so much to people. Do they have usefulness value? Sentimental value? An association with a personal experience? You could bring in your own items or items of course.

As you and the students talk you can write up interesting language as it arises, which students note down.

Here some more low-prep ideas from Sara-Elizabeth's (excellent) blog.

If you wanted to introduce the task with some interesting listening input by telling students about the treasured possessions of some celebrities.

All of which made me think about my most prized possessions. Tricky one! I'd probably go with my wedding ring, iPhone, computer, drum kit and wallet.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,