Skip to main content

A yes/no speaking game

Below is a simple game to practise the use of the negative 'ne... pas' in French. It's based on the old yes/no game where neither partner is allowed to say yes or no. This version is tightly structured and suitable for students with about three years behind them (CEFR A2). With more experienced students you can design it to be more challenging and less structured, for example with a few starter questions to kickstart a general conversation.

Each partner is given a sheet as below.

Personne A     Oui/Non game

Ask your partner the following questions. You must answer without saying oui or non. Every time you say oui or non you lose a point. Take turns with the questions.

1.          Tu vas au lit à sept heures du soir?

2.         Tu vas à l’église le dimanche matin ?

3.         Tu aides tes parents beaucoup à la maison ?

4.         Tu es membre d’un club au collège ?

5.         Tu fais beaucoup de devoirs chaque soir ?

6.         Tu manges des céréales au petit déjeuner ?

7.         Tu te lèves à neuf heures d’habitude ?

8.         Tu vas au supermarché avec tes parents ?

9.         Tu aimes les maths ?

10.        Tu parles espagnol ?

11.        Tu vas au Japon régulièrement ?

12.        Tu joues au football quelquefois ?

13.        Tu aimes la musique classique ?

14.        Tu manges beaucoup de chocolat ?

15.        Tu bois du whisky ?

"……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Personne B      Oui/Non game

Ask your partner the following questions. You must answer without saying oui or non. Every time you say oui or non you lose a point. Take turns with the questions.

1.          Tu parles italien?

2.         Tu aimes les bonbons?

3.         Tu joues au tennis de temps en temps?

4.         Tu aimes la musique jazz ?

5.         Tu visites la France quelquefois ?

6.         Tu aimes l’histoire ?

7.         Tu bois du jus d’orange ?

8.         Tu vas au lit à dix heures ?

9.         Tu fais de la gymnastique au collège ?

10.        Tu aimes faire du shopping ?

11.        Tu écoutes de la musique souvent ?

12.        Tu joues d’un instrument de musique ?

13.        Tu manges beaucoup de légumes ?

14.        Tu vas chez le dentiste régulièrement ?

15.        Tu travailles dans le jardin quelquefois ?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,
4 comments
Read more

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g
2 comments
Read more