Skip to main content

Listen and draw

Listen and draw is a classic, super simple listening activity where the teacher reads a description of a picture which students have to draw. It requires careful processing of language and produces a clear outcome where there is no absolute requirement for a 'right answer'. A practical consideration when  running the task include ensuring that students don't just copy from their neighbour and so avoid listening carefully at all. My primitive solution to this was to get students to place a bag on the table between them to create a barrier.

To do this task successfully I would suggest choosing images which are clear, not too simple, not too cluttered, and which include known vocabulary. A bonus would be if the image contains interesting cultural input, such as a famous building, a style of house or food items on a table. Or how about a famous art work?  If there is going to be any awkward vocab, this can be pre-taught. In any case, you will need to pre-teach some key chunks to do with where items are situated on the page - see the slide below.

Another key point is to make sure you go at a pace which is right for the class, building in any repetition as needed. Keep an eye on how successfully the class is working and give any support, including the occasional translation, to make sure the students get success. You might allow students to put their hands up to ask for clarification: "Where is the ....?"

Once the drawing is complete, students can compare with a neighbour.

To prolong the listening practice you could then read out true/false statements which the class must answer by looking at their picture. Alternatively, just give false statement which students must correct in writing on paper or on a mini-whiteboard.

At this point it would seem natural to move to some oral work if the class is able to do so. You could hand out printed pictures which students could use to do their own 'listen and draw' task in pairs. Or simple tell students to describe to each other the picture they first drew. This gets them to recycle language they have been hearing.

Below are some slides I used for a resource on frenchteacher.net, on the Y10-11 page (CEFR A2). the images are all copyright-free from pixabay.com.









Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,
4 comments
Read more

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g
2 comments
Read more