Skip to main content

What is 'learned attention'?

The second language acquisition and cognitive science literature are full of jargon to explain language learning phenomena. This can be off-putting to teachers who do not often read research. Sometimes you may even get the impression that terms are invented to describe pretty obvious things which don't need jargon - I'm tempted to include terms like the retrieval practice effect, comprehensible input and the Noticing Hypothesis!

Now, learned attention is a term from the literature which is worth explaining, but which describes a phenomenon many language teachers will have thought of and encountered in the classroom. Below is a section from the second edition of The Language Teacher Toolkit (2nd edition) which is due to be published in the early summer. The section comes from Chapter 6 which is about teaching grammar. (L1 = first language, L2 = additional/new language.)

‘Learned attention’

We acquire grammatical patterns by hearing and seeing them in input, but what we pay attention to is partly dictated by what we already know about our L1 and what we think is significant. This means we do not pay equal attention to every grammatical feature – this is what is called learned attention (N. Ellis, 2012).

For instance, English speakers learning Spanish may not notice Spanish masculine or feminine endings of nouns and adjectives in the input, because the notion of grammatical gender does not exist in English. Similarly, English learners of French may not notice that a French verb is in the simple future because in English the simple future is cued by the word ‘will’ whereas in French it is indicated by an inflectional change to the verb ending. For English learners of German, the issue is even more complex owing to word order and cases. This blindness to grammatical features is called blocking (N.Ellis, 2012). An implication of this is that it is not enough just to provide input, we have to make sure we get students to focus on the features they may ignore. Ways to make grammatical features more salient (noticeable) include:

  • Enhancing written text through colour, bold fonts or underlining, e.g. adjectives, articles or verb endings.
  • Exaggerating the sound of important morphemes such as verb endings, e.g. the sound of the past participle in French.
  • Making facial expressions when pronouncing certain morphemes.
  • Using explanation and translation to highlight the difference between L1 and L2.
  • Using the ‘dodgy translation’ technique, e.g. translating German Ich bin gegangen as ‘I am gone’, rather than ‘I have gone’ to remind students that the verb gehen takes the auxiliary sein in the perfect tense.
  • Using form-focused exercises such as: ‘Choose the right ending’, ‘Listen and correct’ and ‘Spot the silent endings’. 

In sum, to enable students to see and hear L2 features blocked by learned attention, grammar teaching is partly about redirecting students’ attention when they read and listen to L2 input, by training them day in day out to focus their eyes and ears on parts of the L2 words and sentences they would not normally see or hear because of their L1 processing habits. 

For the research chapter and verse, here is a link to a freely available book chapter by Nick Ellis.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,