Skip to main content

A game for practising jobs vocabulary

This is a variation of the classic 20 Questions game (animal, vegetable, mineral - you remember the one?) Partner A thinks of a thing and partner B has to work it out by asking Yes/No questions. It's a really good oral fluency games for relatively advanced learners.

My version here relates to job vocabulary. Assuming you have taught, say, 25 jobs using word lists, pictures, definitions, written and spoken texts and so on, let's say you want to embed this knowledge a week or two later, this is what you could do.

Partner A chooses a job which has been learned. Partner B is given a list of 15 questions he or she can ask in any order. Partner B can guess the answer at any time. If partner B uses all 15 questions up they score 15 points. If they correctly guess the job in less than 15 questions they get a number of points equivalent to the number of questions they needed, i.e. 10 questions for a right answer gets 10 points. If they make an incorrect guess at any point they get an extra 10 points. If Partner B cannot guess the job they get an extra 10 points. The aim is to score as few points as possible.

Let's say you have taught these 25 jobs:

Teacher, nurse, doctor, bus driver, computer programmer, plumber, baker, vet, shop salesperson, builder, secretary, electrician, call centre worker, engineer, train guard, postman/woman, headteacher, receptionist, bank clerk, cleaner, website designer, financial consultant, video games designer, refuse collector, farmer.

Here are 15 possible yes/no questions:

1.  Do you work with the public?
2.  Do you work outside?
3.  Do you work with young people?
4.  Do you repair things?
5.  Do you work in a hotel?
6.  Do you work with animals?
7.  Do you do a creative job?
8.  Do you earn a lot of money?
9.  Do you have control over other people?
10. Did you have to go to university to do your job?
11. Did you have to do an apprenticehip to do your job?
12. Do you think your job is boring?
13. Is your job physical?
14. Is your job stressful?
15. Is your job dangerous?

Perhaps you could work out variations on this task. With some classes you could remove the questions from view after a certain amount of time. Or you could display gapped versions of the questions. With others you could let them add their own questions.

The value of the game is that students are recycling the target language multiple times, listening and reading, working on their pronunciation. In its basic form there is no spontaneous use of student-created language, but you could work this in with my suggestions above. This could work well with a Y9 or Y10 class and take about 20 minutes.

Comments

  1. Great idea! I love the 20 questions-type games, and their variants. I will definitely try to implement this. I like the twist of trying to minimize the number of questions students ask for more points.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for commenting. It should work well.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,