Skip to main content

Deezer

Merci Helen. Après mon post sur Spotify il paraît qu'il y ait un autre site semblable qui porte le nom Deezer. Il fait la même chose que Spotify, mais j'ai l'impression qu'il y a plus de chansons françaises que sur Spotify. Maxime Leforestier y est, par exemple. Il existe d'autres sites de ce genre?

Chose intéressante, quand on va sur Spotify (ou Deezer) on découvre de la musique nouvelle et on est tenté d'acheter des albums. C'est pas bête pour les maisons de disques, mais certaines sont réticentes, EMI par exemple, qui ne met pas de chansons des Beatles sur Spotify.

Comments

  1. JY12 May 2009 at 22:25

    Oui mais problème avec Deezer c'est que l'écoute est géolocalisée. En gros, selon le pays où l'on se trouve on ne pourra pas écouter certaines pistes car les accords de Universal USA et FRANCE ne sont pas les mêmes.

    http://www.lepost.fr/article/2009/02/11/1420414_les-nouvelles-frontieres-de-deezer.html

    Des astuces:
    http://www.korben.info/deezer-comment-lire-les-chansons-bloquees-grisees-des-playlists.html

    http://musicfreezer.freehostia.com/


    Bref y'a d'autres services de ce type.

    http://www.infos-du-net.com/actualite/dossiers/161-deezer-streaming-spotify.html

    http://www.justhearit.com/

    http://www.presse-citron.net/twitter-et-la-musique-debuts-dune-idylle


    Sans oublier, à découvrir absolument! http://www.jamendo.com/fr/

    ReplyDelete
  2. JY12 May 2009 at 22:55

    Concept intéressant:
    http://inbflat.net/

    Sinon SongSmith?
    http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/projects/songsmith/

    ReplyDelete
  3. JY12 May 2009 at 23:06

    Bon c'est là soirée des liens (encore 700 à te faire découvrir, mon site avance :p )

    http://odeo.com/

    Adieu Google: http://www.korben.info/yauba-un-moteur-de-recherche-innovant.html

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,
4 comments
Read more

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics
5 comments
Read more