Skip to main content

Drill and skill

An acquaintance from Adelaide stayed with us recently. He helps to administer a "boutique school", which, if I understood him correctly, is Australian for an experimental school. In his school, for example, they don't have a traditional secondary timetable like ours, nor do they have classrooms as such, more like "learning spaces". I could tell that the pupils there did not sit in rows and swallow information in the "mug and jug" fashion!

Anyway, I asked him how they taught languages there without the children working in traditional ways. His answer was that the school did not teach modern languages and that any children who wished to were farmed out to other places. In explaining their approach he coined the term "drill and skill", which I had not heard before but which I immediately understood, as any teacher would.

I sensed, maybe mistakenly, that he did not favour "drill and skill" (called elsewhere "drill and practice" or "skill-building", for example) and this made me reflect for a moment on why I valued it, and continue to value it, at least for the students I am responsible for.

Behaviourism has been long out of fashion, but I have always felt that it offers us language teachers some useful lessons about the value of repetition and drilling to achieve automatic responses and ultimately creative patterns of behaviour. I have always seen it as one very useful club in the bag as we try to get pupils to internalise grammatical patterns and vocabulary. In this model repetition is important, but by its nature is repetitive (!) so one of our skills has to be to practise patterns whilst trying to avoid it seeming dull. There are many ways to do this (e.g. Q/A, repetition, yes/no questions, games) and lesson planning is often about achieving the aim of repeating without it creating boredom. And I may have said here before, I rather like the analogy of learning a musical instrument - you build up skills by practising patterns and building up muscle memory. In sports training students build up overall skill by doing all sorts of simple physical drills. It works.

Needless to say, there is much more to language learning than this - I can hear proponents of Krashen's comprehensible input objecting, for example, plus the fact that pupils learn in different ways - but if we fail to drill and skill, I fear that we are doing our pupils a disservice. We should not be apologetic about drill and skill; many learners enjoy it, many tolerate it (and why should learning always be fun?), but in language learning terms it is good for you!

I read all sorts of interesting developments on MFL teaching blogs, particularly about the use of web tools. I may be wrong, but I  feel that some (and I stress the word some) activities may be fun, but do not actually create a lot of practice. We would be wrong not to exploit the limited time we have for MFL by drilling and skilling as much as we can.

Comments

  1. I use exactly the same analogies when explaining to my lycée pupils why the lesson isn't "fun". I also feel that the "web tools" often take up a lot of time but don't actually produce much. Even for homework they're delighted to tell you that the link didn't work ...for them. I recently asked for a time line on South Africa based on a BBC site and an exercice proposed by the Paris Academy ... I'm still waiting!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not at all anti web or anti technology - in fact the internet has been the best thing for us language teachers since the tape recorder in the late 1950's, but I do wonder about the potentially gimmicky things like Voki or GoAnimate.

    ReplyDelete

Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Sentence Stealers with a twist

Sentence Stealers is a reading aloud game invented by Gianfranco Conti. I'll describe the game to you, then suggest an extension of it which goes a bit further than reading aloud. By the way, I shouldn't need to justify the usefulness of reading aloud, but just in case, we are talking here about matching sounds to spellings, practising listening, pronunciation and intonation and repeating/recycling high frequency language patterns.

This is how it works:

Display around 15 sentences on the board, preferably ones which show language patterns you have been working on recently or some time ago.Hand out four cards or slips of paper to each student.On each card students must secretly write a sentence from the displayed list.Students then circulate around the class, approaching their classmates and reading a sentence from the displayed list. If the other person has that sentence on one of their cards, they must hand over the card. The other person then does the same, choosing a sentenc…

Using sentence builder frames for GCSE speaking and writing preparation

Some teachers have cottoned on to the fact that sentence builders (aka substitution tables) are a very useful tool for helping students prepare for their GCSE speaking and writing tests. My own hunch is that would help for students of all levels of proficiency, but may be particularly helpful for those likely to get lower grades, say between 3-6. Much depends, of course, on how complex you make the table.

To remind you, here is a typical sentence builder, as found on the frenchteacher site. The topic is talking about where you live. A word of warning - formatting blogs in Blogger is a nightmare when you start with Word documents, so apologies for any issues. It might have taken me another 30 minutes just to sort out the html code underlying the original document.


Setting work for home study

A major challenge for language teachers just now is selecting and sharing work with students to do at home. Here a few suggestions on the issue to add to your own. The sites I mention are the tip of the iceberg and focus mainly on French. I have stuck to free resources, not subscription sites.

By the way, I'm not getting into the use of tech here, as I have no great expertise on that. In any case, I imagine for younger learners especially it may be a question of setting other types of work.

ADVANCED

For advanced learners the job is not so tough. There is a plethora of listening, reading and grammar material they can use, whether it be from their textbooks, other resources shared electronically or online resources. You may have your favourites, but for a selection for French you can check out my links here and here. You may want to stick with topics on the syllabus, or free up students to read and listen more generally to what interests them.

One idea I used was to ask students to c…

"Ask and move" task

This is a lesson plan using an idea from our book Breaking the Sound Barrier (Conti and Smith, 2019). It's a task-based lesson adapted from an idea from Paul Nation and Jonathan Newton. It is aimed at Y10-11 pupils aiming at Higher Tier GCSE, but is easily adaptable to other levels and languages, including A-level. This has been posted as a resource on frenchteacher.net.

This type of lesson plan excites me more than many, because if it runs well, you get a classroom of busy communication when you can step back, monitor and occasionally intervene as students get on with listening, speaking and writing.