Skip to main content

Tricolore

 Update 27.3.14 I see that Oxford have just published the latest edition of Tricolore (version 5), the sample of which looks quite similar to Tricolore Total. I shall shortly be reviewing it.

*******************************************************************************

Seven years after Longman published their widely used course, Nelson (in association with the Nuffield Foundation) brought out Tricolore, written by Sylvia Honnor, Ron Holt and Heather Mascie-Taylor. How had things moved on since Cours Illustré and Longman's AV French?

Visually Book 1 is very different. All black and white, but almost every double page spread is filled with photos, cartoon images and simple pictures. There is a fair amount of text, but much of it is now in English. This is a major change. It seems that the authors felt that previous books had been dull to look at and unappealing to pupils. They also wanted to include a good deal of cultural content which had barely been hinted at in the older courses. This was a necessary move.

The layout is frankly messy, with no numbers for exercises, making it hard for the teacher to direct pupils to them. In addition there is little sign of a repeated pattern to the layout, as if the authors (or designers) were keen to avoid any sense of repetition or boredom creeping in. This book is is many respects a quantum leap forward when compared to the earlier offerings for brighter pupils. Because let's not forget: this book ended up being aimed fairly and squarely at quite academic pupils, whether this was the authors' intention or not.

In other respects Tricolore has much in common with its predecessors: grammar is the basis of the syllabus, with selection and grading of material, even if this is far less finely or scrupulously executed as in Mark Gilbert's day. There is room for drilling and practice, but it is less rigorous, which was a frustration to me when I began using the book in 1988. The amount of English to be seen in the book, whilst comforting to pupils, was a challenge to the direct method orthodoxy.  It was perhaps also an attempt to sell the book to schools with a wider range of ability. Remember that modern languages were now being to taught to pupils of all abilities. But here is a further point to this: GCSE exams would soon see the use of discrete skill testing, with much use of English for questioning (sound familiar?!), so it is no surprise to see listening exercises in Tricolore Book 1 with English questions. This would have been anathema to the earlier writers. Maybe Honnor, Holt and Mascie-Taylor were heralding a new age of pragmatism in language teaching methodology.

The Tricolore dynasty continues to this day. We saw Encore Tricolore, Encore Tricolore Nouvelle Edition and recently Tricolore Total. Interestingly a small amount of the original material from Book 1 survives to this day. The story of cat and mouse Tom and Jojo has remained unchanged from 1980 to 2010.

The longevity of the course is testament to the success of its approach with more able pupils. The latest addition is better laid out, colourful, separates better the cultural information from the linguistic and comes with a comprehensive package of support material, including an online resource. It is very user and teacher-friendly, grounded in a sound, eclectic methodology, and much more expensive! Is the current TT better than the older books? Well, it is of its time and , yes, I would have to say better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,