Skip to main content

KS3 pupils to lose entitlement to MFL teaching

Interesting story from Oxfordshire which is upsetting modern language teachers.

"An Oxfordshire head teacher has said she should not be forced to teach foreign languages to her pupils.

Dr Fiona Hammans from Banbury School said a 12-year-old with a reading age of six did not benefit from learning French or German.

She said: "They are so left behind and my real concern is that we don't leave them even further behind.""
I'm slightly reluctant to pass judgement on this story without knowing the precise circumstances and context. I do know that the school is a comprehensive with a wide range of abilitites, home languages and social backgrounds.
It is no doubt worth mentioning that MFL teaching contributes to a child's literacy development. I would also ask why the children should drop language learning rather than, say, a humanity, R.E. or technology. Could one argue that these children with literacy issues would benefit even more from some MFL input? Maybe the bottom line is that this headteacher simply does not place a high value on foreign language learning.
As more schools become academies will they too be tempted to allow children to drop harder subjects? I wonder what Mr Gove would make of this. He might, on the one hand, say that an academy should be free to choose its own curriculum based on individual circumstances; on the other he has nailed his colours to the languages mast with the introduction of the E Bac.
The story has attracted the attention of the ALL (Association for Language Learning) who have issued a statement on their web site:
"In response to a news report on the BBC Oxford website, the Association for Language Learning has been approached by members for our views on the question of a secondary school removing key stage 3 pupils from Language lessons in order that ’we don't leave them even further behind’ in their English.

The Association for Language Learning believes that language learning (i.e. learning a language other than your first language) has positive influences on many aspects of an individual’s development and on their life, that it is relevant at all points in a person’s life and that it is relevant to learners of the widest ability range. We also believe that every learner is entitled to a balanced school curriculum, and disagree that successful language learning in any way leaves pupils at a disadvantage in their development of English.

In our recent response to the Curriculum Review we proposed that:

‘Language learning should... be statutory from Key Stage 2 to KS4.’

‘We believe that all children should have the opportunity to learn languages from an early age and that coherent and relevant programmes of language learning, which build on prior knowledge should be available throughout their primary, secondary and higher education.’

The key point here in the current debate is the word ‘relevant’; the Programme of Study allows teachers to plan their content and progression in order to be motivating and relevant; however in the real world we know that schemes of work in key stage 3 are often already geared to the content of key stage 4 assessments, and ALL members have for some time been expressing concern about the relevance of the content of those current examination syllabuses to our students.

The argument from the Headteacher in Banbury seems to ignore the flexibility offered by the National Curriculum in planning content relevant to all of the learners in key stage 3; ALL members know from experience since the establishment of a national curriculum with a Languages for All policy that appropriate schemes of work can make a considerable contribution to individual learners’ life experience:

•In terms of awareness of language in general

•In terms of a renewed focus on the skills of Listening and Speaking

•In terms of cultural and intercultural experience

•In terms of the life skill of communication

•In terms of promoting confidence and self-esteem

•In terms of contrast between a new language and English, and consequently of Literacy.

On the other hand ALL would be interested to see any evidence that the suggested remediation in English, as late as key stage 3, is effective in terms of educational progress, given the potential for social stigma that would attach at a key point in the psychological development of the individual child.

We are aware from members that some schools have, for some time, been removing pupils from key stage 3 Languages in spite of the national curriculum requirements but would encourage them to rethink this approach.

At a time when our partners in Europe are encouraging a policy of plurilingualism, where all citizens are encouraged to acquire more than one language, this seems isolationist, and not based on sound educational principles.

Finally, within an increasingly interconnected international economy, it would be regrettable that any pupil be deprived so early of an entitlement to encountering the language and culture of other countries, and of the flexibility to travel, study or work abroad or with people from other backgrounds.

Our young people deserve the best education we can provide; this includes their personal development as individuals and as members of a society. It is manifestly unjust to deprive some young learners of access to experiencing another language within a relevant scheme of work. "


Popular posts from this blog

Tell stories


How can we make listening more enjoyable and effective for pupils? How can we turn it from a potential chore to something more memorable (and therefore more likely to stick in their long term memories)? I am of the opinion that since humans are "wired" to engage in personal listening and speaking (the expression "social brain" has been used in this context), they may be more interested and attentive when the message comes from a real person rather than a disembodied audio source. (This may or may not be relevant, but research has been carried out which demonstrates that babies pick up phonological patterns better when they listen to a caregiver rather than listen to a tape or watch a video - see here for summaries of research into this area by Patricia Kuhl.)

One easy way to make listening stimulating for pupils is to tell them easy stories in the target language. I was reminded of this while reading Penny Ur's book 100 Teaching Tips (reviewed here

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

The Language Teacher Toolkit review

We were delighted to receive a review of The Language Teacher Toolkit from eminent applied linguist Ernesto Macaro from Oxford University. Macaro is a leader in the field of second language acquisition and applied linguistics. His main research interests are teacher-student interaction and language learning strategies pupils can use to improve their progress.

Here is Professor Macaro's review:
The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence. So for example the ‘methodological principles’ on page 11 are supported by the research they then refer to later in the book and this approach is very similar to the one that we (Ernesto Macaro, Suzanne Graham, Robert Woore) have adopted in our ‘consortium project’( The point i…

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…