Skip to main content

A reflection on language teaching

We rounded off our handbook for language teachers with a final reflection which attempts to encapsulate our general feeling about the craft of language teaching. This is a slightly adapted version of that afterword.

***************************************************************

If you read our blogs (frenchteachernet.blogspot.com and gianfrancoconti.wordpress.com) you'll know that we are interested in both ends of the second language acquisition spectrum: conscious learning (explanation and skill acquisition through practice) and unconscious (natural and with the focus on meaningful input). The longer we have taught and examined the theory and research over the years, the more we think that there is strong merit in both these perspectives on language teaching. Research into second language learning is still young. Although progress is being made, we cannot yet be sure what is happening in the 'black box' of the brain, but if we make sure we provide meaningful, repetitive, structured exposure to language, with explanation, practice and communicative interaction, learning will occur.
     

Now, the rate at which learning occurs depends on a range of factors, including, crucially, motivation and student aptitude for language learning, then others such as teacher quality, the number and frequency of lessons, amount of homework, spacing of lessons and quality of input. Anything which can be done to optimise these factors will improve the pace of acquisition.
     

Given that we cannot yet be certain to what extent second language learning is like first language learning (it seems very unlikely they are identical), then the sensible course is to exploit a mixture of principled approaches based on what we know about both language learning and learning in general. There is no need to defend one approach against all the others. If the approach provides the elements above - input, output, repetition and reinforcement, interesting material, explanation and so on - it should work.
     

It is also probable that this kind of eclectic approach makes sense given the variation we see in our students. Some seem to thrive on more highly natural or communicative methods, whereas others enjoy a degree of formal explanation to supplement the input. Some like to listen a lot, others like to read; some prefer talking, others writing; some want to become fluent speakers, the majority may just want to get by with some simple situational or conversational language.
     

Not only do students vary, so do teachers. Whatever approach, or mix of approaches, is adopted, you need to believe in it, understand the rationale behind it and execute it efficiently. We believe an excellent all-round teacher will get better results with what might seem a dubious approach (such as grammar-translation), than a less gifted teacher trying to use an ostensibly better method. We know that in our business so much is about classroom relationships, being able to adapt to the moment, having a feel for what students enjoy and, of course, behaviour management.
     

At the start of our handbook we refer to the idea of ‘principled’ eclecticism. Why not exploit a range of principled approaches? Naturalist, meaningful input and form-focused, skill-building methods both have their supporters and with good reason. An approach with elements of each is most likely to be a firm foundation on which to build as a language teacher.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite Ă  60 ans

Suite Ă  mon post rĂ©cent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'Ă¢ge lĂ©gal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir Ă  quel Ă¢ge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'Ă¢ge rĂ©el de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prĂ©tendre qu'il y a peu de diffĂ©rence Ă  cet Ă©gard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation Ă  Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite Ă  60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui dĂ©fend la retraite Ă  60 ans (BVA) CĂ©cile QuĂ©guiner Plus de la moitiĂ© des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la rĂ©forme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de dĂ©fendre l’Ă¢ge lĂ©gal de dĂ©part en retraite Ă  60 ans ". RĂ©sultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majoritĂ© de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui dĂ©fend le maintien de l’Ă¢ge lĂ©gal de dĂ©part Ă  la retraite Ă  60 ans,