Skip to main content

Social forums for language teachers

It goes without saying that social media allow teachers to exchange ideas, activities, lesson plans, problems and successes so much more easily than in the past. The opportunity to pick up ideas beyond your own school or department is fabulous and means that no teacher should feel they are working in a vacuum.

Social media forums change over time. The prime platforms form exchanging ideas are currently Facebook and Twitter. In the UK teachers seem to have moved away from other forums such as TES, although the Yahoo group MFL Resources maintains a healthy following with well over 3000 members.

UK-based Facebook groups include Secondary MFL Matters, MFL Resources and Ideas, Secondary MFL in Wales, MFL Teachers, MFL Teachers' Lounge and Languages in Primary Schools. My impression is that the first of these closed groups is becoming to most popular. Teachers on these closed FB groups are courteous and helpful and trolling (which became an issue on TES) seems to be absent. Having attentive moderators helps with this. The same goes for MFL Resources, better for teachers who do not use Facebook and who are happy to receive emails or check digests of email messages.

Twitter has the largest number of teachers and enables you to connect with teachers all around the world. I find it fascinating to read about language teaching issues from other perspectives and even the different language used to talk about the same issues. Twitter can be confusing, however. For one thing, there is no established protocol for the content of tweets. Some "tweachers" post a lot of social chit-chat, mixed with professional tweets. Others stick to the purely professional, whilst others only tweet socially. This means that, if like me, you are most interested in professional tweets, it can mean trawling though a mass of irrelevant tweets. I confess I would like to see more tweets about pedagogical/professional issues. If you are new to twitter you could check out the the hashtags #mfltwitterati (UK based) and #langchat (mainly American).

On Twitter, one useful form of exchange is the Twitter chat, where a topic is chosen, moderated by a teacher and last, say, an hour. American teachers go in for this more often than British, from what I can tell. You tend to find that relatively few teachers take part, although a good deal more may just be lurking and observing. the format is usually very structured, with the moderator asking a series of questions labelled Q1, Q2, Q3 etc, and answers are pre-fixed with A1, A2, A3 etc. Good moderators make sure people stay on topic and remain courteous.

In general the tone of debate between teachers on Twitter is positive and supportive, although the occasional "twitter spats" are observed. This is sometimes hard to avoid when views are strongly held and, to be fair, language teachers are not the most vociferous educators on Twitter. Joe Dale (@joedale) keeps a list of MFL Twitterers for newbies who may want to know who to follow. It's become a cliché to describe Twitter as the biggest staffroom in the world and the best CPD, but there is a lot of truth in the claim. (I say this as a former Twitter sceptic.)

Blogs are another means by which teachers share their ideas and these allow for more detailed descriptions of lessons and pedagogy. Most allow you to leave comments and engage in some dialogue. The borderline between a blog, website and wiki is pretty hazy these days, by the way. Wikis (where you can contribute resources) are quite rare, but you occasionally come across good ones such as the ALL literature wiki.  Many teachers use the Wordpress platform to produce their own sites or blogs, others find the free Blogger platform (like this one) simpler for straight blogging. I have a lengthy list of French teacher blogs around the world on frenchteacher.net.

All in all, it's fair to say that it is easier than ever to get new ideas, help and support. But beware, it's all too easy to get addicted! You are almost certainly short of time already, so you may need to pick and choose how to interact online.


Comments

  1. This is super helpful! Thank you! I have been having a hard time trying to find age/level appropriate texts to add to my classroom library. Do you know of anymore blogs or wikis that would be beneficial for a dual immersion classroom?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi. I'm not sure what you mean by a dual immersion classroom or what type of texts you mean - whole books or individual srticles. If you could be more precise, I might have an idea or two.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh Sorry about that! I'm going to be doing my student teaching in an elementary school where half the day is taught in French and the other half is taught in English by another teacher. I'll be teaching probably in 1st, 2nd, or 3rd grade. My university professors have encouraged us to start building our classroom libraries now using texts that reflect the language and culture accurately.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite Ă  60 ans

Suite Ă  mon post rĂ©cent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'Ă¢ge lĂ©gal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir Ă  quel Ă¢ge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'Ă¢ge rĂ©el de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prĂ©tendre qu'il y a peu de diffĂ©rence Ă  cet Ă©gard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation Ă  Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite Ă  60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui dĂ©fend la retraite Ă  60 ans (BVA) CĂ©cile QuĂ©guiner Plus de la moitiĂ© des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la rĂ©forme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de dĂ©fendre l’Ă¢ge lĂ©gal de dĂ©part en retraite Ă  60 ans ". RĂ©sultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majoritĂ© de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui dĂ©fend le maintien de l’Ă¢ge lĂ©gal de dĂ©part Ă  la retraite Ă  60 ans,