Skip to main content

Why I shall vote to remain in the EU

Just touching the surface here...

Economic reasons

With over 40% of our trade being within the single market of the EU, it could put businesses and jobs in jeopardy if we are no longer within the single market. Even if we renegotiate with the EU for equal trade status (in a similar way to Norway and Switzerland) we would still be subject to EU regulations - and most likely free movement of labour - but without being able to contribute to decision-making.

Leaving to EU would cause huge instability in the markets. Business likes stability and predictability. Brexiteers are unable to say what will happen if we leave. Renegotiating trade deals with the EU and other countries will be costly and very time-consuming.

Britain does well on inward investment, partly because of our lowish tax regimes, but also because we are in the single market and can be a base for foreign companies to do business across the EU. Would investors want the added red-tape of dealing with a UK separate from the EU?

Education

We enjoy beneficial partnerships with the rest of the EU, the Erasmus scheme for student exchange being just one. Academics are hugely in favour of remaining in the EU. EU students also contribute greatly to our universities' income.

Immigration

Free movement of labour benefits our economy and keep all kinds of services and businesses afloat; care of the elderly, the NHS, agriculture, teaching, IT, engineering, food processing, retail, hotels and catering etc, etc. EU migrants contribute more in taxes than they receive in in or out-of-work benefits. The large majority are young and productive; they had the initiative to move. We depend hugely on immigration to service our ageing population and will continue to do so. We have this in common with other European nations.

Rising population does put pressure on services. We need to make sure these are sufficient to cope with the immigration we need.

Brexiteers say we do not control our borders. This is only partly true. We control immigration from beyond the EU and we choose to allow free movement across the EU (with passport control into the UK since we are not in the Schengen agreement area). We choose free movement for the benefits it brings us and the freedom it allows our citizens to move to other EU countries to live and work (many thousands do, of course).

"Net contribution"

Larger nations like Britain and Germany do pay more in than they get out through the CAP and regional funds, but it is small sum per person. It does not take into account the profits which businesses make by trading in the EU. It is impossible to know precisely what our net gain or loss must be.

History

For me this is one of the key reasons to remain in this European project. European history has been characterised by wars between nation states. We have enjoyed an unprecedented era of peace and prosperity in western Europe which looks set to continue. To leave now would destabilise the EU and conceivably lead to a domino effect which could even see us return to the historical paradigm of inter-nation conflict. We should be immensely proud of this collective achievement.

The EU is imperfect, the Euro far from a proven benefit, Schengen under pressure owing to migration, but the bigger picture remains the same. We derive huge benefits from a single market. Wealth is shared and we all gain; as poorer nations in eastern Europe develop they become stronger markets for our goods and services.

Democracy

The EU institutions are imperfect, but they do represent a democracy of sorts. The Council of Ministers where we have a say makes the major decisions, ratified by the European parliament which houses our elected MEPs. Our own British democracy is far from perfect.

You sometimes get the impression from the anti EU media that Brussels is always doing things "to us", as if we are not part of the decision-making process. We are in a club which works for the benefit of all. We are major players in decision-making.

Red tape

If you live in a single economic market it is inevitable and desirable that you share rules so that businesses are on an equal footing. If a company makes a washing machine it needs to be saleable in 28 different nations. It makes no sense to have 28 different sets of regulations.

If we did not have EU red tape we would have to make up our own (to be acceptable to the EU and other nations). Red tape is a fact of life and the EU has taken steps to reduce it.

Agriculture

What will our farmers do if we leave the EU. Many (most?) would go under without CAP subsidies. Our government (taxpayers) would have to subsidise farming to maintain food supplies, as the Americans do. If we do not subsidise, prices from the farm and in the shops will rise and farmers will not be able to compete with their EU counterparts.

Environment

EU environmental laws affect us hugely and work to our benefit. CO2 and pollution does not recognises borders. Sensible environmental policy can only be made at an EU and international level. Thanks to EU-agreed rules we have cleaner cars, cleaner beaches, cleaner air, less polluted rivers and much more. EU targets help us move towards greener energy.

National identity

Although free movement makes our nation more multi-cultural and multi-lingual, this just changes our identity somewhat, as immigration always has done over the centuries. We should celebrate diversity and denounce xenophobia. When we hear unfamiliar languages it would be better if we were curious rather than uncomfortable. Why should anyone feel uncomfortable about? In any case, in or out of the EU, we shall continue to experience diversity.

Foreign policy

The UK is a medium-sized power with the fifth or sixth largest economy in the world. Militarily and diplomatically we rank alongside France. As world leaders such as Barack Obama say, we exert more influence working along with the EU as one powerful bloc.

Scotland

If we were to leave the EU it is quite possible that pressure will mount for another referendum for independence, one which may lead to the break-up of the UK. It's up to the Scots, but I would rather not see the UK split.

Miscellaneous

Gove, Johnson, Farage, Cummings, Lawson, Grayling, Tebbit, Putin, Trump et al. It's hard to identify with these people's views.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

Dissecting a lesson: using a set of PowerPoint slides

I was prompted to write this just having produced for frenchteacher.net three separate PowerPoint presentations using the same set of 20 pictures (sports). A very good way for you to save time is to reuse the same resource in a number of different ways.

I chose 20 clear, simple, clear and copyright-free images from pixabay.com to produce three presentations on present tense (beginners), near future (post beginner) and perfect tense (post-beginner/low intermediate). Here is one of them:





Below is how I would have taught using this presentation - it won't be everyone's cup of tea, especially of you are not big on choral repetition and PPP (Presentation-Practice-Production), but I'll justify my choice in the plan at each stage. For some readers this will be standard practice.

1. Explain in English that you are going to teach the class how to talk about and understand people talking about sport. By the end of the lesson they will be able to say and understand 20 different sport…

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Designing a plan to improve listening skills

Read many books and articles about listening and you’ll see it described as the forgotten skill. It certainly seems to be the one which causes anxiety for both teachers and students. The reasons are clear: you only get a very few chances to hear the material, exercises feel like tests and listening is, well, hard. Just think of the complex processes involved: segmenting the sound stream, knowing lots of words and phrases, using grammatical knowledge to make meaning, coping with a new sound system and more. Add to this the fact that in England they have recently decided to make listening tests harder (too hard) and many teachers are wondering what else they can do to help their classes.

For students to become good listeners takes lots of time and practice, so there are no quick fixes. However, I’m going to suggest, very concisely, what principles could be the basis of an overall plan of action. These could be the basis of a useful departmental discussion or day-to-day chats about meth…

GCSE and IGCSE revision links 2018

It's coming up to that time of year again. In England and Wales. Here is a handy list of some good interactive revision links for this level. These links are also good for intermediate exams in Scotland, Ireland and other English-speaking countries. You could copy and paste this to print off for students.

Don't forget the GCSE revision material on frenchteacher.net of course! How could you?

As far as apps for students are concerned, I would suggest the Cramit one, Memrise and Learn French which is pretty good for vocabulary. For Android devices try the Learn French Vocabulary Free. For listening, you could suggest Coffee Break French from Radio Lingua Network (iTunes podcasts).

Listening
http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/french/ (Foundation/Higher) http://www.bbc.co.uk/languages/french/ (Foundation/Higher)
http://www.audio-lingua.eu/spip.php?rubrique1&lang=fr (Foundation/Higher) http://www.ashcombe.surrey.sch.uk/07-langcoll/MFL-resources/french/fr-video-index.shtml