Skip to main content

What if we have our whole approach to MFL teaching wrong?

Whenever I write about language teaching I try to maintain a pragmatic, open-minded view about methodology. This isn't always easy when you've been taught and trained in a certain way (for me the oral-situational approach based on a grammatical syllabus) and worked within an English system where the high stakes GCSE and A-level exams dominate the scene and, to an extent, dictate teaching approaches. Nevertheless I endeavour to present a range of methods as having value as long as they respect some basic principles to do with input and practice. I do this because I find it interesting and hope other teachers do too.

I quite recently wrote two blogs about the Teaching Schools Council report on MFL pedagogy. They are here and here.To remind you, that report came out strongly in favour of a skill-acquisition approach to classroom language teaching. The emphasis should be on explicit, structured teaching of grammar and phonics, along with high frequency vocabulary possibly at the expense of the topics. The report claimed that this emphasis was based on the latest research evidence.

Much of the report made sense to me (given my own bias mentioned above), but in my second blog I pointed out that the research evidence for the TSC report was cherry-picked. To support this view, let me quote to you from Geoff Jordan, a British applied linguist, who puts forward a theoretical position held by a number of influential scholars in the field. This is taken from a blog he's written and it sums up a view of second language acquisition which is the antithesis of the TSC's skill-acquisition position. Jordan attacks three assumptions about skill-acquisition. I quote almost verbatim:

Assumption 1

In SLA, declarative knowledge converts to procedural knowledge. Wrong! No such simple conversion occurs. Knowing that the past tense of has is had and then doing some controlled practice, does not lead to fluent and correct use of had in real-time communication.

Assumption 2

Second language acquisition is a process of mastering, one by one, accumulating structural items. Wrong! All the items are inextricably inter-related. As Michael Long says:

"The assumption that learners can move from zero knowledge to mastery of negation, the present tense, subject- verb agreement, conditionals, relative clauses, or whatever, one at a time, and move on to the next item in the list, is a fantasy."

Assumption 3

Learners learn what they’re taught when they’re taught it. Wrong – as every teacher knows! Pienemann (1987) has demonstrated that teachability is constrained by learnability."


Now, it should be made clear that far from all researchers agree wholeheartedly with the above, but it is fair to say that the evidence for TSC, skill-acquisition view is far from settled. Indeed, for academics in general teaching grammar is much less important than it seems to be for most teachers. They can, as yet, find little convincing evidence that explicit grammar instruction and practice is the best way to enhance acquisition.

Is learning a language like the learning of any skill? Do we build up skill by learning, one by one, the component skills until we master the whole? Can we turn declarative knowledge of grammar into procedural knowledge through practice? Can spontaneous speech be developed through structured practice and focus on form?

Or is language acquisition fundamentally different? Does it all happen at a sub-conscious level, largely or wholly immune to the order teachers present and practise material? Is the best thing we can do just provide interesting input at the right level and let the brain do its natural thing?

The jury is still out, I'm afraid.

In the meantime, in the UK classroom context where GCSE and A-level hold sway, your traditional mix of grammar and topics with a dose of CLT (and TLC) still has a lot going for it. Your big get-out clause is that even when you teach a grammatical syllabus you are providing comprehensible input at the same time, even if it may be less than perfect.

Geoff Jordan references:

Long, M.H. (2011) “Language Teaching”. In Doughty, C. and Long, M. Handbook of Language Teaching. NY Routledge.

Pienemann, M. (1987) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. In C. Pfaff (Ed.) First and Second Language Acquisition Processes. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 143-168.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad


  1. 'let me quote to you from Geoff Jordan, a British applied linguist, who puts forward a theoretical position held by a number of influential scholars in the field.' If it's only a theoretical position, why do you give it any weight? Why not look to empirical research?

  2. Jordan's view is, he would say, supported by empirical evidence. If there is a consensus at the moment it is that comprehensible input is the basis of acquisition, supported by some focus on form.Thank you for commenting.

  3. hi
    from my quick look at report in addition to skill-aquisition,

    there is a recommendation based on input processing:
    "Practice of the grammar point in ‘input language’ (listening and reading), doing structured tasks which require identification of a grammatical feature and linking it to a meaning or function, normally with other contextual clues stripped away."

    possible usage-based theories:
    "Generally, teachers stated, and research shows, that language learning needs repetition to embed knowledge."

    possible interaction approach in the Errors: anticipation and correction section

    sometimes i got confused when report mentioned "practice" as to whether they meant practice in the input or practice in the output;

    so there is a case to say that there are more is one "theory" being referred to in this report?

    wonder if the DFE literature review is available yet? that may give a better ideas of theories being used in the report?


    1. Yes, the things you mention give a role to imput, but the emphasis is still on showing grammar in input, not laying the stress on meaning only. Yes, repetition is referred to, as one would expect. When practice is referred to I think the stress is on output. What they recommend is what you see in some textbooks - grammar built and repeated in short texts at the presentation stage, then quickly and explicitly taught.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

Dissecting a lesson: using a set of PowerPoint slides

I was prompted to write this just having produced for three separate PowerPoint presentations using the same set of 20 pictures (sports). A very good way for you to save time is to reuse the same resource in a number of different ways.

I chose 20 clear, simple, clear and copyright-free images from to produce three presentations on present tense (beginners), near future (post beginner) and perfect tense (post-beginner/low intermediate). Here is one of them:

Below is how I would have taught using this presentation - it won't be everyone's cup of tea, especially of you are not big on choral repetition and PPP (Presentation-Practice-Production), but I'll justify my choice in the plan at each stage. For some readers this will be standard practice.

1. Explain in English that you are going to teach the class how to talk about and understand people talking about sport. By the end of the lesson they will be able to say and understand 20 different sport…

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Designing a plan to improve listening skills

Read many books and articles about listening and you’ll see it described as the forgotten skill. It certainly seems to be the one which causes anxiety for both teachers and students. The reasons are clear: you only get a very few chances to hear the material, exercises feel like tests and listening is, well, hard. Just think of the complex processes involved: segmenting the sound stream, knowing lots of words and phrases, using grammatical knowledge to make meaning, coping with a new sound system and more. Add to this the fact that in England they have recently decided to make listening tests harder (too hard) and many teachers are wondering what else they can do to help their classes.

For students to become good listeners takes lots of time and practice, so there are no quick fixes. However, I’m going to suggest, very concisely, what principles could be the basis of an overall plan of action. These could be the basis of a useful departmental discussion or day-to-day chats about meth…

GCSE and IGCSE revision links 2018

It's coming up to that time of year again. In England and Wales. Here is a handy list of some good interactive revision links for this level. These links are also good for intermediate exams in Scotland, Ireland and other English-speaking countries. You could copy and paste this to print off for students.

Don't forget the GCSE revision material on of course! How could you?

As far as apps for students are concerned, I would suggest the Cramit one, Memrise and Learn French which is pretty good for vocabulary. For Android devices try the Learn French Vocabulary Free. For listening, you could suggest Coffee Break French from Radio Lingua Network (iTunes podcasts).

Listening (Foundation/Higher) (Foundation/Higher) (Foundation/Higher)