Skip to main content

Book review: Scott Thornbury’s 30 Language Teaching Methods (2017)

This is the first book I have read by the well-known writer from the EFL world Scott Thornbury and I can recommend it as a concise introduction to a wide range of language teaching methods and approaches.


At only 130 pages you could read this volume in one or two sessions, or could dip into any of the short chapters which interest you most. The book is arranged in four parts, with Thornbury deciding to group each method into six general themes: natural, linguistic, communicative, “visionaries”, self-study methods and a final part entitled Beyond Methods. As the writer points out, this is a reminder that methods do not succeed each other in a historical sequence. However, this choice of structure does have its slight limitations as there are significant overlaps not only between methods within one theme, but across those from different themes. For example the Situational Method has a good deal in common with the Oral Method, and Communicative Language Teaching could easily be viewed as a natural type of approach. (Some writers, for example, combine the Oral and Situational Approaches.)

Each chapter is neatly divided into four sections:

1. The background (historical origins and theoretical underpinnings).

2. How does it work? - a description of the method.

3. Does it work? - what is the evidence for the method’s success?

4. What’s in it for us? - what aspects of the approach might be useful to teachers.

In Part Six Thornbury writes concisely about the principled eclecticism and what Kumaradavidelu has called the “post-method condition”. (See my recent posts on this.)

Readers will find lucid accounts of familiar approaches, for instance grammar-translation, the oral approach, direct methods, communicative and natural approaches, including TPRS. There are also descriptions and evaluations of some of the more exotic and unusual methods which have been tried out including Michel Thomas, The Silent Way, Suggestopedia and Dogme (developed by Thornbury himself and pretty well unknown to modern language teachers). Dogme, if you are interested, is an attempt to declutter the classroom of technology, books and other resources and to allow language learning to occur from somewhat improvised lessons led in part by the learners themselves.

In addition Thornbury devotes the fifth of the six parts to self-study methods, including programmed learning, such as used with Duolingo, the popular self-study app.

Thornbury goes out of his way to give a balanced and pragmatic account, with brief references to research and examples of further reading for those who would like to go into greater depth. Most trainee and practising teachers will learn something new and have their minds opened. Some readers, who take a more ideological standpoint, may be frustrated by Thornbury's reluctance to follow a single theoretical line. Teachers will also see that there is a good deal which different approaches have in common and that while a single method may work for some people in some circumstances, a wiser outlook may be to adapt, in a principled fashion, the best in various methods to one’s own circumstances. As Thornbury writes (p. 126):

“In the end all methods are eclectic, in the sense that they borrow from, build on, and recycle aspects of other methods. Our understanding of how and why this happens, and of how these same processes of appropriation and reconfiguration impact upon our own teaching, is part of our ongoing professional development.”

Scott Thornbury’s 30 Language Teaching Methods is available for around £10 or less from CUP, Amazon and other suppliers.





- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,