Skip to main content

GCSE exam resources on frenchteacher

This is for your information if you aren’t already a subscriber to frenchteacher.net.

As well as the very many worksheets for listening, video listening, grammar, reading comprehension and vocabulary, I have a bunch of resources specifically written to help with preparation for GCSE exams. I list them below, divided into Foundation and Higher tiers. Note that the AQA-style sheets are fine for other exam boards. At a rough guess, at least a quarter of all secondary schools in England subscribe to the site, so you may want to have a look at it. There are many samples and testimonials to look at. An annual subscription is £25 for over 1400 separate resources. Many schools subscribe year after year, for which I am very grateful!

Foundation Tier GCSE resources

- Knowledge organiser (for speaking and writing)
- AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
- AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
- Photo card conversation mat
- AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
- AQA GCSE general conversation questions
- AQA conversation questions as boardgames
- 100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
- Reading exam
- Reading exam (2)
- 10 Foundation Tier translations into English (with answers)
- How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (PowerPoint)
- How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier GCSE resources

- Listening revision booklet
- Knowledge organiser (for speaking and writing)
- AQA-style GCSE 2016 role-plays
- AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
- AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
- AQA GCSE general conversation questions
- AQA conversation questions as boardgames
- 20 Higher Tier translations into French (with answers)
- 10 Higher Tier translations into English (with answers)
- A reading to writing task for essay writing (holidays)
- Reading exam (Higher tier)
- How to write a good Higher Tier essay (PowerPoint)
- Stick-in writing strips
- How to write a good Higher Tier essay (Word)
- Help sheet for developing range in essays
- Set of 10 reading comp gapfills for GCSE/IGCSE.
- Further set of 10 gapfills for GCSE/IGCSE (different format).
- Higher GCSE style gapfill tasks
- Identifying attitudes – 100 statements to decipher
- Reading tasks for GCSE revision
- Common written errors at GCSE

In addition to the above I have the following “legacy GCSE” resources which are still useful, including for IGCSE:

- 50 French signs to explain- low intermediate to intermediate (Y9-11) (Word doc) (1).
- 50 French signs to explain – low intermediate to intermediate (Y9-11)(Word doc) (2).
- 50 French signs to explain (3) – low intermediate to intermediate (Y9-11)(Word doc).
- 50 French signs to explain (4) – low intermediate to intermediate (Y9-11)(Word doc).
- 50 French signs to explain (5)- low intermediate to intermediate (Y9-11)(Word doc).
- Signs dominoes game
- Powerpoint(1) of the second set of 50 signs.
- Powerpoint (2) of another 50 signs.
- Powerpoint (3) of another 50 signs.
- Powerpoint (4) of another 50 signs.
- Powerpoint (5) of yet another 50 signs.
- Conversation game (thanks to MGS online)
- Listening tasks based on Encore Tricolore 4
- Help sheet for developing range in written essays
- Written error checking exercise
- Record and Self Evaluation sheet for British teachers (edit online)
- Easy guide to writing a basic exam essay
- Tips for writing – a stick- in sheet




- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g