Skip to main content

Book review: Ça marche! by Maria Harney

When I presented recently at the MFL Alive conference for Irish MFL teachers in Maynooth, it was clear that the main thing on their mind was the introduction of the new Junior Cycle syllabus for MFL, which, crudely speaking, is about introducing a more communicative and inclusive approach to language teaching for secondary students. Along with the new syllabus come a crop of new text books, one of which is the one Maria Harney kindly gave me for this review.

This is where you can find the French syllabus for the Irish Junior Cycle, by the way. You'll see the stress on communication and the needs/interests of children.

The course is called Ça marche! I'm looking at the first year book and its accompanying "portfolio" book and CD. The second book is for years 2 and 3 of the course nad is co-written with Anne Grills. There is also a free e-book to accompany these materials. Hats off to them both for putting all this material together - it’s a mammouth task!

To make sense of Book 1 for you I've decided to focus on one unit to get a flavour of its approach, including its qualities and any possible shortcomings as I see them.

The unit Mon temps libre would be tackled, I would guess, at least a third of the way through the first year of French. The first page (see photo) lays out the "can do" statements. I wonder how good a use of page space this is. I know how constrained writer-teachers are by publishers in terms of how much practice material you can fit into a unit, so to me to take up a whole page with a large photos and a list of unit aims seems to be a waste.



The unit then moves on as follows;

1.  A cultural information video to watch with some questions in English. the sports referred to are the Tour de France and the game of pétanque. I'm afraid I don't know if the video clip is in French or English. In any case I like this initial focus on background culture as a "soft landing" into the topic. I immediately see how this might suit all abilities.

2. A listen and repeat exercise on a few sports in French followed by a "strategies2 style box pointing out how cognates can be used to infer meaning. A short, very simple exercises reinforces the message. I would think this could be supported by some flashcard repetition work or more vocabulary faster pupils.

3. Some semi-authentic infographics on sport with facts and figures for reading comprehension, followed by questions in English. (A pity these could not have been squeezed on to the same page.)

4. A verb paradigm featuring the verb jouer (all persons). Spaces are left for the teacher to work on translations into English for each part of the verb. This is followed bya grammar box on jouer au/à /aux. This is supported by a short gap-fill exercise. To do it pupils need to know the gender of the sports which they can find by looking back two pages.

5. Listening gap-fill requiring the use of single words. This is followed by some questions in English and translation of chunks into French on the same material. I like the inclusion of simple transcription and the reinforcement of the meaning thereafter through the questions.

6. A strategy box on how to be careful to avoid word-to-word translations.

7. A short pair work QA  task, the grid for which could be quickly copied on to paper or mini whiteboard. I'm sure this would need modelling carefully beforehand.

8. Paradigm of the verb faire with verbs and pronouns to complete. using faire + du/de la/des. As with the previous verb jouer this would need supporting with a good deal of other practice, e.g. chanting or singing. The question remains how wise is it to teach whole paradigms in this way. This is followed by a sentence completion exercise where pupils choose du/de la/des. Curiously the partitives are labelled prepositions in the instructions.

9. A listening and copying of vocabulary exercise follows. Words have to be classified as masculine, feminine or plural.

10. An exercise where pupils decide whether to use au/à la/aux or du/de la/des.

11. A very brief reading exercise based on an infographic about participation in sport.

12. A vocab list of places where you can do sports. Pupils then match the sport to the place.

13. A listen and repeat task form the CD.

14. A true/false reading comprehension exercise.

15. A listening task with a grid to complete in English. which sport? When? Where?

16. Paired QA which brings together previously practised material (likes, sports, when and where).

17. A self-evaluation exercise to be done in pairs.

18. A box explaining how depuis is used followed by a short listening exercise on the same.

19. Listening gap-fill of a longer extract (single words, no options given) - so the focus is on accurate transcription here, not meaning. But this is followed by questions in English to focus on meaning.

20. A "portfolio" task - this is the pupil's workbook where they can note vocabulary, prepare and write short written pieces.

Portfolio page


21. Two reading comprehensions, one on a short passage, the other on four tweets (questions in English). pupils then write their own tweet using the models.

22. Listening and repeating some more vocabulary. Then a short listening task with answers in English to insert into a grid.

23. reading with questions in English.

24. Video clip with questions in English.

25. Introduction to regular -ir verbs with a  complete paradigm followed by a strategies box on regular versus irregular verbs. pairs are then invited to explain the rules for -ir verbs. More verbs are then given, with meanings to match up. (A dictionary would be needed for this.) then a verb gap-fill to do.

26. A "group talk" task on likes and dislikes. This is described as a three steep process moving from personal answers, to pairs, then groups.

27. The verb aller is introduced in all parts in a paradigm, followed by work on au/à la. There is a link to a verb rap on YouTube.

28. Work on seasons and weather, combined with sports.

29. A penfriend letter with questions in English.

30.A summary page with vocab listed and can-do recapitulation pages.


Phew! I probably gave you too much detail there!

To make total sense of this book, I would need to know what it is replacing and I'm afraid I haven't seen any older Irish French text books. Overall, what I have read through looks like a unit with all abilities in mind. I like the variety of tasks, clarity of layout, the audio material and the accessibility for less able pupils. I like less the amount of English questioning, focus on single words and verb paradigms with lack of textual context for the verbs. I would be looking for more exploitable reading material. It doesn't feel particularly rigorous to me; perhaps somewhat bitty. I would think some teachers would want to heavily supplement the material with more able groups. For myself, I don't detect very clearly what the "method" is behind the unit and the book, beyond the broadly communicative bias. Like many books it is what you might call weakly communicative with grammar and strategies bolted on. In that sense it's absolutely in the mainstream and similar to course books in the UK.

The portfolio book looks very usable, with "stars and wishes" for pupils to add formative assessment credentials. 

The whole book has eight units: introducing yourself, school, family, home, free time, food and drink, a school day and holidays. There is plenty of material for a year, maybe even too much. There are some verb tables at the back of the book. The book is no doubt well-matched to the Irish Junior Cycle but could also be used in the UK and ought to be on your list of possible purchases.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Dissecting a lesson: using a set of PowerPoint slides

I was prompted to write this just having produced for frenchteacher.net three separate PowerPoint presentations using the same set of 20 pictures (sports). A very good way for you to save time is to reuse the same resource in a number of different ways.

I chose 20 clear, simple, clear and copyright-free images from pixabay.com to produce three presentations on present tense (beginners), near future (post beginner) and perfect tense (post-beginner/low intermediate). Here is one of them:





Below is how I would have taught using this presentation - it won't be everyone's cup of tea, especially of you are not big on choral repetition and PPP (Presentation-Practice-Production), but I'll justify my choice in the plan at each stage. For some readers this will be standard practice.

1. Explain in English that you are going to teach the class how to talk about and understand people talking about sport. By the end of the lesson they will be able to say and understand 20 different sport…

Designing a plan to improve listening skills

Read many books and articles about listening and you’ll see it described as the forgotten skill. It certainly seems to be the one which causes anxiety for both teachers and students. The reasons are clear: you only get a very few chances to hear the material, exercises feel like tests and listening is, well, hard. Just think of the complex processes involved: segmenting the sound stream, knowing lots of words and phrases, using grammatical knowledge to make meaning, coping with a new sound system and more. Add to this the fact that in England they have recently decided to make listening tests harder (too hard) and many teachers are wondering what else they can do to help their classes.

For students to become good listeners takes lots of time and practice, so there are no quick fixes. However, I’m going to suggest, very concisely, what principles could be the basis of an overall plan of action. These could be the basis of a useful departmental discussion or day-to-day chats about meth…

Responsive teaching

Dylan Wiliam, the academic most associated with Assessment for Learning (AfL), aka formative assessment, has stated that these labels have not been the most helpful to teachers. He believes that they have been partly responsible for poor implementation of AfL and the fact that AfL has not led to the improved outcomes originally intended.

Wiliam wrote on Twitter in 2013:

“Example of really big mistake: calling formative assessment formative assessment rather than something like "responsive teaching".”

For the record he subsequently added:

“The point I was making—years ago now—is that it would have been much easier if we had called formative assessment "responsive teaching". However, I now realize that this wouldn't have helped since it would have given many people the idea that it was all about the teacher's role.”

I suspect he’s right about the appellation and its consequences. As a teacher I found it hard to get my head around the terms AfL and formative assess…