Skip to main content

The power of improvisation


Do you ever have those lessons where things didn't go to plan, but went really well nevertheless? Sometimes you have to improvise or adapt to circumstances and no doubt part of being an effective teacher is having the ability, sometimes borne of experience, to adjust a lesson on the spur of the moment.

In Jack C. Richards' excellent book Key Issues in Language Teaching (2015) Chapter 6 is devoted to the theme of increasing the effectiveness of lessons. He begins his chapter with a section on adjusting the plan during the lesson. He describes some of the unplanned decisions teachers have reported making during a lesson - he calls them interactive decisions (from Richards, 1998).

Timing factors
  • Dropped activity because of time.
  • Added activity to fill out time.
Affective factors
  • Added activity to liven up the class.
  • Modified activity to increase interest level.
Pedagogical factors
  • Changed sequence of activities.
  • Elaborated an activity.
  • Changed grouping arrangements.
  • Changed or dropped activity because of difficulty.
  • Dropped activities that didn't seem necessary.
  • Added activities to strengthen the lesson.
Language focus
  • Modified activity to change the language focus.
  • Added an activity to provide more language work.

Richards goes on to quote a teacher and teacher educator from Brazil, Isabela Villas Boas, who explains how important incidental teaching is. She writes; "Teachers have to be sensitive to unplanned but rich learning opportunities that arise during a class and let go of the lesson plan, even if for a short while, to take advantage of students' interest and motivation."

A good example she mentions is when unplanned but interesting vocabulary comes up. In this case, because of the unplanned context in which the vocab arose it's more likely students will remember it. Your sudden enthusiasm for something spontaneous like this may well communicate itself to the class too. Another example would be when you realise that the class is far less capable of manipulating a language structure or area of vocabulary than you thought, so you feel the need to do some additional practice on the spot. Further common instances of needing to improvise are when behaviour during a task is not right, when technology lets you down or when you suddenly learn your class is curtailed because of a whole school activity.

Now, I would add that this ability to improvise is a a great and subtle skill which depends on a range of factors, among them your cognitive and affective empathy with the class. How well do you judge in real time the level of challenge and interest of the task you are working at? Your formative assessment skills help a lot with this. Experience will also tell you when an improvised activity is worthwhile or just time-wasting as well as how well certain activity types are progressing and when a twist to the lesson is needed. Then there are those occasions when in your planning you forgot to include a really good task, then realise during the lesson you can use it effectively.

Sometimes of course the improvised activity doesn't work out quite as you had hoped, but that's the nature of teaching. It's interactive, subtle, dependent on the class in front of you, your mood on the day and your level of preparedeness. Incidentally, sometimes you can include something in your plan, then make it seem to students as if it were improvised! "Ooh! Now this is interesting! I wasn't going to teach you this, because normally I'd do it with older classes, but I think you're smart enough to get it."

So careful planning of lessons is vital, but I wouldn't be too concerned if you sometimes go hors piste if the returns are worthwhile.

References

Richards, J.C. (ed) (1998) Teaching in Action: Case Studies from Second language Classrooms, Alexandria, VA: TESOL
Richards, J. C. (2015) Key Issues in language Teaching. Cambridge.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,