Skip to main content

Will it work?

It’s one of those questions you have to ask when you are lesson planning. Will it work? Now I’ve been out of the school classroom for over six years, it’s also a question I also ask when writing resources for my site. With lesson planning it’s an absolutely crucial question, of course, and if you have a really good feel for your class you’ll more than often get it right.

I suppose I have to preface this by asking how do you know if a lesson worked? Well, on my list would be: Did the class work hard? Were the aims achieved? Did they get input and practice at the right level? Did they enjoy the class (not, by the way, did they have fun, but did they find the work stimulating and challenging enough?).

So what factors do we keep in mind when planning for these outcomes? Here are some which occur to me:

1. Have I pitched it right?

Will this lesson hit the sweet spot in terms of level of challenge? To get this right you need to know the class well and have that key sense of “cognitive empathy”. This is what I wrote about this in a previous blog:

“...the capacity to understand another's perspective or mental state. In teaching we can say that it refers to the teacher’s ability to marry every level of their teaching (e.g. planning lessons, classroom delivery, feedback provision, target-setting, homework) to their students’ thinking processes. We could break it down as follows:

An awareness of the cognitive challenges posed by language learning in general and by the specific language items you’re teaching. For example, knowing that the learning of adjective agreement is tough for English-speaking students because the concept doesn’t exist in English; or anticipating that direct and indirect object pronouns in French will be especially hard because of the word order problems they create; or being aware of the challenges posed by the German case system.

An understanding of how students respond to such challenges.

This involves an awareness of how cognition in a language learning context is affected by individual variables, e.g. age group, gender, personality type, culture, etc. For example, younger students usually find it harder than older ones to apply grammatical rules taught explicitly. Some topics appeal to some groups more than others, depending on the make-up and background of the class.”

So that sounded a touch academic, but you’ll probably agree all those factors play a role in how well you pitch the lesson.

2. Sensing the mood of the class.

This is more about “affective empathy”. What have you done in recent lessons and how did it go down? How did they react to certain types of approach: pair work, group work, games, teacher-led tasks, grammatical explanations, vocab tests etc? Do you need to add more variety? Does the class need livening up or calming? Can they concentrate for a certain length of time? What did they say they enjoyed?

3. Did it work before?

I think this is really important. If a lesson went well previously there is no guarantee it will again, but the odds are much higher it will. So why not reuse or refine lesson types or sequences you have used before with that class. We know students are comfortable with routines and know how you work after a while. Take advantage of this by deploying a familiar repertoire of techniques, e.g. questioning, drill types, “turn and talk” style pair work, picture sequences, flashcard use and so on.

4. Seek advice from other colleagues.

If you are quite new to language teaching you will inevitably get planning from on occasion, so if in doubt check with experienced colleagues who will give you their best advice. If this is not possible, for instance if you are in a one person department or communication is poor, then it’s easy to get quick advice from social networks, especially the Facebook professional groups.

5. Adapt to the moment.

Let’s say you’ve planned a lesson, but when the class arrives you have second thoughts about it. Maybe the mood of the class is wrong; maybe you just feel like doing something different on the spur of the moment. That happened to me quite a lot, and it’s fair to say that gets easier when you have a repertoire of fall-back lessons up your sleeve. Teachers will sometimes tell you their best lessons were those where they decided to improvise and change plan. In this case it’s as much about your mood as the class’s. Perhaps you’d planned for a fairly “passive” lesson with pupils listening, reading or writing, but you just feel like getting stuck in with some interaction. That spontaneous decision may work well since you approach the lesson with added gusto.

So deciding what will work can feel instinctive,but underlying this instinct are all sorts of factors. Who ever said teaching was a science?



- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,