Skip to main content

Exploiting listening texts with modelling in mind, not testing

One of the staples of language lessons is the listening lesson based around an extract of audio or video text. With a focus on comprehension, common ways of exploiting such material are by setting tasks such as:

- True/false/not mentioned
- Tick the correct statements
- Multiple choice questions in L1 or L2
- Questions in L1 or L2

These are all well and good if the focus is on testing comprehension. Such activities can be frequently found in text books which are often written with a particular assessment regime in mind, e.g. the GCSE examination in parts of the UK. But if you would like to design your worksheets with a greater focus on intensive listening and “listening as modelling” you can consider a different range of exercises. Here are some, along with a justification for their use.

Classic gap-fill

This requires closer listening than that which may involve mere word spotting for comprehension. Gaps can be chosen with different goals in mind. If you wish the focus to be on phonics, then omit single letters or syllables. If the focus is on lexical retrieval, omit key meaning words. If it’s parsing you wish to prioritise then omit parts of verbs, whole verbal phrases or parts of sentences where the syntax plays a role in creating the meaning (e.g. use of the passive voice).

Gap-fill summary

In this case write a paragraph or set of sentences which are a reasonably close to the original text, but where a degree of extra reading comprehension or grammar manipulation is required. This adds an extra level of interest and challenge for students.

Sentence completion

This is a variation on the above. Provide starts or ends of sentences which students must complete by close listening.

Correct the transcription

Provide an imperfect transcription of the text. Students have to underline where they hear a discrepancy, then write in the correct original version. This requires picking out individual words or short chunks from the sound stream. Typically you design the faulty transcription to contain synonyms or near synonyms of the original. This requires retrieval of already known words and deeper processing of vocabulary. Alternatively, at a more difficult level, students may need to underline a longer chunk, rewording it with different syntax, thus building parsing skill.

Complete a glossary

Provide a lost of L1 words the translation of which must be found from the text. To make the task more difficult supply a list of words which are synonyms or near synonyms of the words they need to find from the text. The focus here is on lexical retrieval.

Note-taking

Students have to listen closely to make detailed notes in L1 or L2 on factual or other details from the text. Notes can be fed back orally or in writing to a partner or the teacher.

Summary

At intermediate level this requires close listening, note taking, then adapting or simplifying the source text. Students must summarise the content, using their own language as far as possible. By doing this students develop their skill with vocabulary and grammar, and ultimately therefore, their ability to listen successfully.

Translation into L2

Provide a list of L1 sentences which students must translate by locating them in the text. To make it harder, make sure students have to adapt the source text a little. The stress here is is on vocabulary, morphology and syntax.

Transcription

Short texts can simply be transcribed as if students were doing a dictation. The emphasis is on phonics, but also involves knowledge of grammar and vocabulary.

Note that with all the above tasks you or the students can play the text as many times as needed. If any parts of the audio or video are particularly tricky, you can slow them down either by reading them yourself or using a facility such as that offered by YouTube. Crucially, if the text has been chosen to be largely comprehensible all students should be able to build their confidence and achieve success. It may be that any of these tasks are more productive than the one suggested in your text book.

Finally, if the source text is longer than you would like to exploit it intensively, then adapt or shorten it as necessary. In essence, as soon as you feel the source is becoming overwhelming for classes, do it differently. By adopting this approach over a period of years your students will be more able to cope with some of the challenging listening exercises they may encounter in examinations.

Sources of authentic audio and video

Finding authentic sources at an appropriate level is a challenge, but here are a few suggestions which may help you.

- The site audio-lingua.eu has many hundreds of short audio clips (largely under three minutes) in multiple languages recorded by native speakers. Pick and choose carefully for content and audibility.

- If you search carefully you will find a range of easier video recordings such as individual YouTubers’ clips, commercial uploads, very simple cooking recipes, TV adverts and short but easy news items. I’d stress, however, that it’s wise to be very choosy and stick to the most comprehensible source material, scaffolding nay tasks as much as necessary to ensure students can process the language.

- Cartoon videos for very young native speakers can be a useful and enjoyable source. The humour, familiarity and relatively easy language makes some suitable for intermediate learners. Again, pick and choose carefully, favouring those with the easiest vocabulary. I suggest Peppa Pig which is translated into many languages and easily available online. Providing a glossary can compensate to some extent when you think the level is a little above what you would like. Don’t forget that the best listening tasks have input which is highly comprehensible.

So, in sum, there’s loads more you can do to go beyond that text book exercise if it’s not focused enough on the process of listening for your taste.

For lots more ideas on how to get the best out of lessons with a focus on listening, look out for the book called Breaking the Sound Barrier which Gianfranco Conti and I shall be publishing soon.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g