Skip to main content

Interaction in second language learning (Part 1)

This is the first of two posts summarising Chapter 6 of the book Second Language Learning Theories, by Mitchell, Myles and Marsden (Routledge, 3rd edition, 2013).

The authors begin by reminding us of the obvious fact using a second language is beneficial for learning it. Yet some people who are exposed for many years to a second language still make mistakes when using it. In the late 1970s Krashen hypothesised that receiving comprehensible input is all you need to acquire a language (the “Input Hypothesis”). Subsequently in the 1980s Michael Long, while accepting Stephen Krashen’s basic premiss and the existence of a “language acquisition device” in the brain (Chomsky), turned the focus towards interaction (the “Interaction Hypothesis”) suggesting that input alone is not enough and that interaction with the input is needed to learn.

Long argued that for learners to obtain input and repetition at the right level they need to take part in conversation. His early research indicated that during game-playing and conversation learners “negotiate meaning”, make clarification and confirmation requests, thus refining the input. In short, interaction makes the input more useful for acquisition.

More recent research from the 1990s has delved further into the role of interaction, focusing less on Krashen’s “black box” Language Acquisition Device and more on the latest findings from cognitive and language processing theory.
Some of this research has focused on the use of recasts and prompts during interaction.

If we step back a moment to the 1980s, complementing Long’s work Merrill Swain developed the “Output Hypothesis” (yes, second language acquisition research has many hypotheses!). Swain argued that learners’ own speech played a role in promoting noticing and intake of new language. We’ll return to this in Part 2.

Long’s 1996 revised Interaction Hypothesis

“It is proposed that environmental contributions to acquisition are mediated by selective attention and the learner’s developing L2 processing capacity, and that these resources are brought together most usefully, although not exclusively, during “negotiation for meaning”. Negative feedback obtained during negotiation work or elsewhere may be facilitative of L2 development, at least for vocabulary, morphology and language-specific syntax, and essential for learning certain specifiable contrasts.” (Long, 1996)

We should understand from the last part of that quotation that Long believes some aspects of a language need particular attention and feedback, e.g. correction, to be mastered. Long’s hypothesis bears in mind the mental processes involved in getting INPUT to become INTAKE. These include the use of selective attention and L2 processing capacity.

Interaction and the learning of target L2 structures and vocabulary

Mackey (1999) carried out a study to find out if interaction would boost the knowledge of question forms on English as a second language. The low-intermediate adult learners did a range of information gap tasks which required them to ask questions. Some participants in the study had the opportunity to interact with the teacher while were not. His results indicated that the “interactors” progressed with question formation while the others didn’t. Other studies have confirmed that interaction assists with the acquisition of specific aspects of language.

The role of feedback

The role of feedback on learners’ errors has long been a focus of research, even before the interest in interactionist theory. Those who support the Universal Grammar view of things, e.g. Krashen, argue that correction plays an unimportant role. Learners develop proficiency and accuracy through input. However Long (1996) argues that negative feedback can be useful to learners. By this he means that feedback involving reformulation of the learner’s own intended utterances can help the learner notice the gaps between their performance and the correct version. For example, learners may become aware when there are differences between the L1 and L2 structure.

Separately, researchers who see second language learning as a form of skill acquisition (i.e. language learning is like the learning of any complex skill), believe feedback helps with the establishment and proceduralisation of declarative knowledge. In other words correction can help with the automatisation of linguistic skill.

Research on types of error correction, e.g. recasts and explicit correction have produced mixed results. In general the research suggests that corrective feedback tends to be useful, but that no particular type has been shown to be better than others. The authors note, by the way, that recasts can be seen not so much as corrective feedback but just another source of correct input, depending on how much attention the learner is paying. Recasts can be seen therefore as positive reinforcement. In contrast, prompts of explicit correction may be less ambiguous and therefore moe useful to learners.

Part two to follow.

References

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie and Bhatia (eds.) Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press.

Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: an empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

Mitchell, R., Myles, F. and Marsden, E. (2013). Second Language Learning Theories. Oxford: Routledge.



- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Designing a plan to improve listening skills

Read many books and articles about listening and you’ll see it described as the forgotten skill. It certainly seems to be the one which causes anxiety for both teachers and students. The reasons are clear: you only get a very few chances to hear the material, exercises feel like tests and listening is, well, hard. Just think of the complex processes involved: segmenting the sound stream, knowing lots of words and phrases, using grammatical knowledge to make meaning, coping with a new sound system and more. Add to this the fact that in England they have recently decided to make listening tests harder (too hard) and many teachers are wondering what else they can do to help their classes.

For students to become good listeners takes lots of time and practice, so there are no quick fixes. However, I’m going to suggest, very concisely, what principles could be the basis of an overall plan of action. These could be the basis of a useful departmental discussion or day-to-day chats about meth…

Responsive teaching

Dylan Wiliam, the academic most associated with Assessment for Learning (AfL), aka formative assessment, has stated that these labels have not been the most helpful to teachers. He believes that they have been partly responsible for poor implementation of AfL and the fact that AfL has not led to the improved outcomes originally intended.

Wiliam wrote on Twitter in 2013:

“Example of really big mistake: calling formative assessment formative assessment rather than something like "responsive teaching".”

For the record he subsequently added:

“The point I was making—years ago now—is that it would have been much easier if we had called formative assessment "responsive teaching". However, I now realize that this wouldn't have helped since it would have given many people the idea that it was all about the teacher's role.”

I suspect he’s right about the appellation and its consequences. As a teacher I found it hard to get my head around the terms AfL and formative assess…

Five great advanced level French listening sites

If your A-level students would like opportunities to practise listening there are plenty of sources you can recommend for accessible, largely comprehensible and interesting material. Here are some I have come across while searching for resources over recent years.

Daily Geek Show

I love this site. It's fresh, youthful and full of really interesting material. They have an archive of videos, both short and long, from various sources, grouped under a range of themes: insolite (weird news items), science, discovery, technology, ecology and lifestyle. There should be something there to interest all your students while adding to their broader education. Here is one I enjoyed (I shall seriously think about buying tomatoes in winter now):




France Bienvenue

This site has been around for years and is the work of a university team in Marseilles. You get a mixture of audio and video material complete with transcripts and explanations.This is much more about the personal lives of the students …

Sentence Stealers with a twist

Sentence Stealers is a reading aloud game invented by Gianfranco Conti. I'll describe the game to you, then suggest an extension of it which goes a bit further than reading aloud. By the way, I shouldn't need to justify the usefulness of reading aloud, but just in case, we are talking here about matching sounds to spellings, practising listening, pronunciation and intonation and repeating/recycling high frequency language patterns.

This is how it works:

Display around 15 sentences on the board, preferably ones which show language patterns you have been working on recently or some time ago.Hand out four cards or slips of paper to each student.On each card students must secretly write a sentence from the displayed list.Students then circulate around the class, approaching their classmates and reading a sentence from the displayed list. If the other person has that sentence on one of their cards, they must hand over the card. The other person then does the same, choosing a sentenc…