Skip to main content

Advanced communicative tasks on frenchteacher

Task-Based Language Teaching gets a lot of support from the research field. Communicative tasks with a real purpose to fulfil, maybe a purpose related to ‘real life’, are claimed to be an efficient and enjoyable way to promote language learning.

I first discovered this type of activity back in the 1980s when they were sometimes called Task-Oriented Activities. They were common in the field of EFL/ESL, but less known in MFL classrooms. A classic book setting out their justification, with examples you could adapt for MFL, was Discussions that Work by Penny Ur, subsequently rewritten years later. It’s worth seeking out still.

My experience with communicative tasks was positive, but like some other teachers, I found them most effective with advanced students who have a much greater stock of vocabulary and grammatical skill to call upon. The biggest supporters of task-based methodology argue that they can work fine with younger learners if the emphasis of the task is on input, not output.

On the frenchteacher.net A-level page I have a good number of tasks of this type, where the emphasis is on meaning and accomplishing a goal, not so much language form. Among them is an adaptation of a Penny Ur task where a pair or small group of students has to arrange guests around a dinner table depending on a number of criteria and keeping in mind the personalities and views allocated to each guest. Another Penny Ur task involves designing the layout of a zoo based on animal characteristics. I designed a similar one about designing a school layout based on given criteria. Coming up with other ideas like this is an interesting, creative language teacher challenge.

A task I particularly like is called Ask the Experts (based on a task described by Nation and Newton called Ask and Move. This involves giving different paragraphs of written text to, say, three students. When the information in the paragraphs is combined, you get a summary of (in my examples) an A-level topic, such as family, immigration or New Wave cinema. The same format can be used with narrative texts.

The three ‘experts’ are quizzed in turn by the other students who have been given a set of questions to find answers to. 

This is a ‘milling about’ task where you need roughly at least 8 students in the class. The questioners can only complete their answers by speaking to all the experts, who find answers from their paragraphs.

Subsequently, the questioners get their notes together to summarise the information.

This task is especially useful for dealing with informational texts which might be hard to exploit in other interesting, communicative ways.

In another enjoyable task, more of a role-playing one, pairs have to resolve parent-child situations and conflicts, such as the discovery of cannabis in a bedroom or an ‘undesirable’ boyfriend.

EFL is full of inventive lessons of this type, while MFL has remained a bit stuck in the mud, in my view. No great change since the 1980s.

To sum up, if you haven’t tried tasks like these, you might find that they freshen up lessons and appeal to students. Essentially, they provide the basic foodstuff for acquisition: input and interaction. With the added motivation they offer, you have a good recipe.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g