Skip to main content

A simple conversational starter or filler

Do you fancy a break from the normal theme-based work, translation practice, listening test? Simple conversation starters can promote communication, provide input and interaction, help you get to know your students even better.

This is an old favourite which requires zero preparation and can take conversation in unpredictable directions. Just give a short sentence starter like the following:

“I feel happy when...”

“I feel sad when...”

“I am scared when...”

“I was amazed when...”

“I hate it when...”

“I love it when...”

You could just say the sentence starter and see what responses you get, then react to answers to build interesting conversation. Or if the class is less forthcoming, you could give them a few minutes to think and jot down some ideas before hearing what they have to say, or getting them to share in pairs or small groups. The advantage of you taking part is that the students get to hear higher quality input and you can choose what you want them to hear. The advantage of the paired or group option is that the pressure will be off students to perform to you and they may be more honest, open and fluent in their responses.

Once students have chatted in pairs or groups for five minutes or so, you can listen to some of their ideas, adding new vocabulary as necessary and dealing with any grammar issues. 

To give this activity a little twist and to provide more listening input, you could say sentences which students have to match with one from the menu of starters above (or similar). For example:

“I go to the dentist.”

“I have an exam.”

“I see a spider.”

“My favourite team wins.”

“I listen to Taylor Swift.”

This would turn the task into something less communicative, something more like a repetitive drill, but you could still react to responses and build some conversation from there.

Could you use this with younger classes? With some scaffolding (e.g. options on the board), yes. But keep in mind the risks of pushing students to communicate beyond their means. This could create anxiety and reduce self-efficacy. 

Learning through conversation seems to me to be one of the most satisfying ways to build confidence, motivation and proficiency. Students get a say in determining content, they gain confidence and they build a relationship with you and other class members. They also have a good time.

This happens to fit with Deci and Ryan’s self-determination model of motivation. But that’s another story.

https://www.gqrgm.com/what-is-self-determination-theory-sdt-why-does-it-matter/


 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,