Skip to main content

Veggie Pride à Lyon

Familles végétariennes défilant lors de la Veggie Pride.
Familles végétariennes défilant lors de la Veggie Pride. Image: L'Express.

J'ai toujours eu l'impression qu'il y a moins de végétariens en France qu'au Royaume-Uni. Selon un site qui promeut le végétarisme il y aurait environ 1 million de personnes en France qui se déclarent végétariens. Le site Vegesoc prétend que nous serions 3 millions à éviter la viande au Royaume-Uni. C'est pour cela peut-être que nos "veggies" ne ressentent pas le besoin de manifester pour leur régime. A Lyon par contre certaines familles désirent sensibiliser le public au traitement des animaux et pourquoi pas? Je suis parmi ceux qui en toute hypocrisie mangent de la viande sans croire que c'est une habitude moralement justifiée. Si je devais abattre un animal moi-même, je resterais au fromage et aux noix.

Reportage de l'Express:

La Veggie Pride se tiendra le 15 mai à Lyon. Les manifestants, végétariens, souhaitent que le traitement des animaux destinés à l'abattoir devienne une vraie question politique.
Le 15 mai, à Lyon, se déroulera la Veggie Pride, une manifestation de végétariens.
Les participants à cette Veggie Pride ne se considèrent pas de la mouvance écologiste: l'objectif est de faire de l'abattage des animaux un vrai sujet politique.
La manifestation a regroupé plus de 400 personnes les années passées à Lyon, et jusqu'à 700 lorsqu'elle se déroulait à Paris. Tous types de personnes y participent. En fin de cortège, une section est dédiée aux familles végétariennes, au nombre d'une vingtaine. Sara Fergé de l'association précise: "Elles s'en prennent plein la tête, alors qu'elles cherchent seulement à transmettre à leurs enfants leur éthique: le respect des animaux."
Depuis quelque temps, l'association qui organise la manifestation note que la condition de l'animal commence à devenir une vraie question de société. Elle souhaite aussi faire une demande officielle pour que le gouvernement reconnaisse le végétarisme comme un mode d'alimentation viable.

http://www.vegetarisme.info/spip.php?article401

http://www.vegsoc.org/nvw/2002/presspac2.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics