Skip to main content

Flipping the classroom

Some teachers have been taking advantage of technology to experiment with the "flipped classroom" as it has become called. If you are not so familiar with the concept yet, it involves getting students to start the learning process at home, then reinforcing the work in class afterwards. The theory is that students do some preparation and thinking at home first, at their own pace, then practise what they have learned in class. In some subjects this might mean, for example, that students learn some basic information at home, start thinking about it, then use valuable classroom time for more reflection, analysis and discussion.

The concept is not really revolutionary. Teachers have often set reading to be done at home so that class time can be used for discussion. Typically, an A-level class might read some pages from a novel, guided by a worksheet, then class time is used for communicating in French (which is less easily done at home). What is new is the emphasis on technology and, in particular, the use of video.

Certain advantages of the flipped classroom occur to me: pupils can work at their own pace without distraction, they can review explanations as many times as they wish, they can easily catch up with any missed work. In addition, if the material is well chosen, it may be quite motivating.

So I can see that flipping can have its place, but it seems to me that in general, in the context of language teaching, that place need not be huge. There are certain obvious practical difficulties: what if a student does not have access to a computer or tablet? What if the student does not do the work in preparation for the lesson? What is the student wants to ask questions at the exposition stage and cannot do so at home?

To an extent, these arguments apply to the non-flipped context - students do fail to do traditional homework and their printer runs out of ink surprisingly often. More significantly, it seems to me to be harder to check that work has been done in the flipped model unless you provide a worksheet or other format to demonstrate something has actually been achieved. I spent my whole career assuming that students would sometimes not do their homework or cheat by copying ( I hated that and came down like a ton of bricks on cheats). My suspicious nature and meticulous checking usually led to homework being done.

Most of all, however, my feeling is that you can enthuse a pupil enough in class to set follow-up work which they will willingly and successfully do as reinforcement. This model works fine if done well and should remain the norm. Furthermore, the flipped model works less well in MFL as we rely less on explanations and conceptual thought than other subjects. Much of our work is about exposure to target language and structured practice. We can already listen and talk a lot in class, then leave reading and writing for the home. That's fine. Homework can be checked and/or marked and we can maximise exposure to the language.

For those who have not tried flipping, there are language teachers out there who blog about it. Try these:

http://fliplearningmfl.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/an-exciting-mention.html?spref=tw http://languagesresources.wordpress.com/2014/01/12/the-flipped-mfl-classroom
(Samantha Broom writes about her experiments with the flipped classroom)

http://spanishflippedclass.blogspot.co.uk/ (Flipping My Spanish Classroom)

The ACTFL has published this guide:

https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/TLE_pdf/TLE_Nov13_Article.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,