Skip to main content

Three ways to get student feedback

Heads of Languages these days have to have processes in place to evaluate the performance of their department. Sources of information include value-added measures from the likes of Raiseonline, FFT, Yellis and ALPS, internal assessment scores, lesson observations and what are fashionably known as "learning walks".

Students themselves provide another source of useful feedback for self-evaluation. Many schools do this on a whole school basis, for example, using a private survey organisation. Such surveys produce satisfaction levels for each department.

But there are other ways of eliciting student feedback and I'm going to mention three of them.

Focus groups

It is easy to gather a small cross-section of students to ask them about their experience of language learning. Although in this format students may tend to say what they think the teacher wants to hear, they do provide useful feedback if the questions you ask are good ones.

You could take out the teacher factor by using sixth-formers to ask the questions, but they would be less skilled at delving deeper into answers.

Student diaries

You could get a selection of students (or whole classes?) to keep a diary of their lessons over a given period, say three weeks. They could record what they did in lessons, what they enjoyed and what they found useful. Diaries could be anonymous, although there are obvious dangers with this. The advantage of the diary approach is that students would be providing a more detailed reflection than the kind of information they might give using a tick box approach.

Students would need to be carefully briefed and asked to focus on activity types and why they found them useful or otherwise. You would get them to reflect on the language learning process - this is useful in itself. You would advise them, of course, not to focus on remarks about their teachers.

Class questionnaires

These can be set departmentally of by the individual class teacher. The former approach feels more "top down". The latter may be preferable.

A free Survey Monkey questionnaire could be produced online. These analyse the responses for you and allow for a range of question types (multi-choice - single or multiple answers, yes/no questions, written answers).

Alternatively, an A4 sheet with a series of agree/disagree questions, boxes to tick or numerical grading score might work well and be quick to analyse. Here are some questions you could ask at KS3:

Rate how useful and how “enjoyable” to you the following activities are. Use a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 equals leas:

Repeating all together for pronunciation 
Answering the teacher’s questions with hands up 
Answering the teacher's questions with no hands up 
Doing a comprehension task with the CD 
Doing a pairwork oral task
Learning vocabulary for a test
Doing a written grammar exercise
Playing a language game
Memorising a short talk
Doing a dictation
Doing an interactive computer activity
Copying down grammar notes
Watching a video
Listening to the teacher talk in English about cultural information
Translating

What do you find easiest about language learning?
What do you find hardest?
Are there any activities you think you should do more of?
Does your teacher have a good idea of your strengths and weaknesses?

********************************************************************

To conclude, although student surveys, focus groups and diaries might produce surprising information, and while they may confirm the hypothesis that students are different and have different preferences, my hunch is that good teachers can reasonably predict the outcomes of such feedback. This is probably one reason they are good.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,