Skip to main content

University Challenge game

Some teachers tell me that they think we've gone too far down the gamification road in language teaching. They may be right, although my first response is that a game or game-like activity is just another language practice task with a purpose. The fact that games often involve a bit of fun and competition adds to the motivation factor. Needless to say, a good language game needs a decent learning goal and behaviour needs to be right.

"University Challenge" is a long-running British television quiz show where teams of four students from rival universities pit their knowledge against ecah other. This is a high-level quiz show! The team members answer questions from Greek mythology to advanced mathematics, to quantum physics, to medieval history.

This format works brilliantly in language lessons, particularly with advanced level groups. You divide your small group into two teams. If the group is larger, some students will be mainly listeners. You prepare a long list of questions about the culture of the target language country. Divide the questions into categories, e.g. geography, history, famous people, food and drink, language, industry and agriculture, tourism and entertainment. You'll need at least 100 questions.

The teacher asks a TL starter question and a member of each team tries to buzz in. (A tap on the table will do if you don't have buzzers from the science or tech teachers.) No conferring between team members is allowed at this stage. If a player buzzes in before the end of the question and makes an error, they lose 5 points. A correct answer gains 10 points. If a starter question is answered wrongly someone from the other team can buzz in and have a go. Make the starter a relatively easy question. Whichever team gets the starter question right has the chance to answer three follow-up questions - conferring between team members is now allowed. (You could involve onlookers/listeners to supply answers if the team does not know them.) These follow-up questions can earn 5 points each.

After the follow-up questions have been answered you ask the next starter question and so on. A game might last about 30 minutes provided you have a large supply of questions.

This is a great game because all the communication is in target language, the students get to show off prior knowledge, learn new stuff about the TL culture and, importantly, you can tailor the level of questions and language to the class, probably incorporating work you have done in class. To make answers accessible you can give three options, multi-choice style. Don't forget that, for our purposes, you can ask plenty of linguistic questions: " What's the opposite of...?" "How do you say.... in (TL)" etc. Fans of comprehensible input should love this!

I kept a bank of questions and usually saved the game for the end of term. I used it with advanced students, but could have adapted it for intermediate level, but you'd have to make sure the onlookers are engaged somehow. They could write down answers to be tallied up at the end for a winning score.

So I wouldn't diss games in general, just bad ones.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g