Skip to main content

Why is question-answer technique so important?

The extensive use of question-answer (QA) in language teaching is associated most closely with two quite contrasting approaches to language teaching. The first is what is sometimes termed the British oral-situational approach (developed most notably in the 1960s), the second is the TPRS approach where it is called circling. Most teachers use QA to a considerable degree whatever their pedagogical view about second language learning.

In the oral-situational context, QA was was developed by teachers as one form of direct method, with the principal aim of developing grammatical awareness and proficiency through the recycling of heard and spoken language rather than translating. Rules would be "internalised" through repeated use. The teacher took the lead and pair and group work was not very common.

Oral-situational QA is often, at beginner level, very focused on grammatical form, putting specifically chosen grammatical points in quasi-communicative contexts.("Where is the monkey? It is in the tree." - even though everyone can see it is in the tree.) Questions are often "finely tuned" to elicit answers featuring the grammatical or vocab point being targeted. Critics argue therefore that it is too focused on grammar, not enough on meaning and real-life use of language.

In the TPRS context question-answer is much more focused on communicating authentic meaning and is less focused on grammar, although its proponents may argue that grammatical awareness and proficiency are its ultimate aims. Although grammatical and lexical points may be repeated, question are far less finely tuned to grammatical structures (more typically a small handful of target words or phrases). In fact, strong proponents of TPRS would argue that grammar should not be targeted at all.

Whatever your theoretical bias, QA needs to be done well to work. When this is the case it has the following advantages, I would argue:

  • It provides good teacher models for listening purposes (in fact this may be its main goal).
  • It provides repeated practice in chosen lexical and grammatical areas.
  • It represents communication, albeit in a somewhat artificial form. Most academics believe that language is at the very least partly acquired by hearing comprehensible input and "negotiating meaning".
  • It allows for subtle scaffolding in the classroom (you can choose questions for specific pupils - forget "lolly sticks!").
  • It can form part of a broader lesson plan, e.g. after oral teacher-led QA you can do pair work QA, oral-written QA or written-written QA.
  • It is often a low preparation task once the skill has been mastered.
  • In the right hands it can bring the class together and reinforce good classroom discipline.
  • When pupils take the lead they get to practise lots of question forms.

When I trained back in 1979-80 at London University the QA approach was dominant, too much so (at the expense of other types of communicative work, including information gaps and pair/group work which were soon to come along from EFL). Nevertheless, I would suggest that it still has an important role. Below is a table which presents a hierarchy of question types which can be used at all levels. In the classroom, by exploiting all these question types and other forms of interaction, you can encourage pupils to listen well, understand everything and produce good models of language themselves.

Don't forget that all these question types can be used in both oral and written form. With beginners you might choose to work quite systematically from the top to the bottom, i.e.from easiest to hardest.

Question type
True/false statement.
Tom is a cat. True or false?
Students simply process a statement rather than a question form with its varying sentence structure. Students just have to respond true or false.
Yes/no question through intonation.

Tom’s a cat?
Students just say yes or no. There’s no question form to decode. The intonation of the voice shows it’s a question.
Yes/no question.

Is Tom a cat?
Students have to do a little more decoding here, but still only have to say yes or no.
Either/or question.
Is Tom a cat or a dog?
A little more decoding is required, but students only have to choose between the two options they’re given.
Multiple-choice question.

Is Tom a dog, cat, elephant or crocodile?
Slightly harder than the above because of the added options.
Question word question.
What is Tom?
The hardest question type since the students can’t use much in the input to help them produce their answer.

I would just like to reinforce two points:

QA being is a great scaffolding device. Random questioning of pupils, to my mind, seems to be inappropriate since it deprives you of your ability to match questions to pupils. Why ask a really hard question to a struggling pupil? Why give a really easy one to your best student? QA allows to exercise your professional skill pushing each student to the their limit.

Secondly, QA is an excellent way to develop listening skills as you are constantly releasing carefully controlled language in understandable chunks, gradually building up complexity over time.

To conclude, QA is usually best done at pace to encourage quick responses and you can maintain whole class involvement by mixing up QA with individual and choral repetition of answers and by getting pupils to write down answers they hear on paper or mini-whiteboards.


Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

A zero preparation fluency game

I am grateful to Kayleigh Meyrick, a teacher in Sheffield, for this game which she described in the Languages Today magazine (January, 2018). She called it “Swap It/Add It” and it’s dead simple! I’ve added my own little twist as well as a justification for the activity.

You could use this at almost any level, even advanced level where the language could get a good deal more sophisticated.

Put students into small groups or pairs. If in groups you can have them stand in circles to add a sense of occasion. One student utters a sentence, e.g. “J’aime jouer au foot avec mes copains parce que c’est amusant.” (You could provide the starter sentence or let groups make up their own.) The next student (or partner) has to change one element in the sentence, and so on, until you restart with a different sentence. You could give a time limit of, say, 2 minutes. The sentence could easily relate to the topic you are working on. At advanced level a suitable sentence starter might be:

“Selon un article q…

Google Translate beaters

Google Translate is a really useful tool, but some teachers say that they have stopped setting written work to be done at home because students are cheating by using it. On a number of occasions I have seen teachers asking what tasks can be set which make the use of Google Translate hard or impossible. Having given this some thought I have come up with one possible Google Translate-beating task type. It's a two way gapped translation exercise where students have to complete gaps in two parallel texts, one in French, one in English. There are no complete sentences which can be copied and pasted into Google.

This is what one looks like. Remember to hand out both texts at the same time.


_____. My name is David. _ __ 15 years old and I live in Ripon, a _____ ____ in the north of _______, near York. I have two _______ and one brother. My brother __ ______ David and my _______ are called Erika and Claire. We live in a _____ house in the centre of ____. In ___ house _____ …

Dissecting a lesson: using a set of PowerPoint slides

I was prompted to write this just having produced for three separate PowerPoint presentations using the same set of 20 pictures (sports). A very good way for you to save time is to reuse the same resource in a number of different ways.

I chose 20 clear, simple, clear and copyright-free images from to produce three presentations on present tense (beginners), near future (post beginner) and perfect tense (post-beginner/low intermediate). Here is one of them:

Below is how I would have taught using this presentation - it won't be everyone's cup of tea, especially of you are not big on choral repetition and PPP (Presentation-Practice-Production), but I'll justify my choice in the plan at each stage. For some readers this will be standard practice.

1. Explain in English that you are going to teach the class how to talk about and understand people talking about sport. By the end of the lesson they will be able to say and understand 20 different sport…

Designing a plan to improve listening skills

Read many books and articles about listening and you’ll see it described as the forgotten skill. It certainly seems to be the one which causes anxiety for both teachers and students. The reasons are clear: you only get a very few chances to hear the material, exercises feel like tests and listening is, well, hard. Just think of the complex processes involved: segmenting the sound stream, knowing lots of words and phrases, using grammatical knowledge to make meaning, coping with a new sound system and more. Add to this the fact that in England they have recently decided to make listening tests harder (too hard) and many teachers are wondering what else they can do to help their classes.

For students to become good listeners takes lots of time and practice, so there are no quick fixes. However, I’m going to suggest, very concisely, what principles could be the basis of an overall plan of action. These could be the basis of a useful departmental discussion or day-to-day chats about meth…