Skip to main content

Au Revoir les enfants worksheets

Some time ago Paul Heywood sent me his worksheets for use with the film Au Revoir les enfants, one of the prescribed films for A-level French (all exam boards).They are freely available on the Samples page of frenchteacher.net. Here is the first worksheet from the set.


Louis Malle: Sa vie et son œuvre

Faites des recherches sur la vie de ce metteur en scène/réalisateur français:


1. Quand est-il né et où? Est-il encore vivant?

2. Qu’est-ce qui lui arrive pendant l’Occupation?

3. Il travaille avec quel réalisateur très célèbre et quel est le résultat?

4. Qu’est-ce que c’est le mouvement du cinéma qui s’appelle La Nouvelle Vague?

5. Louis Malle en fait-il partie?

6. Quelle musique emploie-t-il dans son excellent film noir en 1957?

7. Pourquoi à ton avis les films suivants suscitent-t-ils toujours la polémique? : Les Amants (1958), Le souffle au coeur (1971), Lacombe Lucien (1974)

8. Au Revoir les enfants: Bref, de quoi s’agit-il?

9. A-t-il gagné des prix de cinéma? Lesquels?

Le film

Après avoir regardé les premières 20-25 minutes du film, répondez aux questions suivantes:

• Quelles sont tes impressions de la première scène ?
• Quelle est ton opinion du comportement du garçon (Julien) au début et à la fin de la scène/dans le train ?
• Où va-t-il Julien ?
• C’est quelle sorte d’école et quelles sont tes impressions ?
• Pourquoi Julien se bat avec l’autre garçon ?
• Quelle est la réaction des enfants quand le nouveau arrive et comment s’appelle-t-il ?
• Que penses-tu des cours ?
• Qui arrive dans la cour et que veut-il ?
• Joseph, le garçon qui travaille dans la cuisine – que fait-il ?
• Pourquoi Jean Bonnet énerve Julien ?
• Qu’est-ce qui se passe pendant le cours de maths et que fait tout le monde ?
• Pourquoi la scène a l’abri se montre-t-elle significative pour nous, les specateurs/spectatrices ?
• Quand ils prient avant de se coucher, qu’est ce qui vous frappe ?



- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g