Skip to main content

Practical activities for balanced listening instruction (Part 1)

This is the first part of a summary of an excellent webinar about teaching listening by Beth Sheppard from the University of Oregon. She makes the central case that we tend to teach "listening for comprehension" (a product approach) rather than teaching the process of listening (the process approach). The contrast is neatly summed up as follows:

Product approach: students listen to learn. The goal is to understand the message.
Process approach: students learn how to listen. The goal is to get students to improve their listening technique, learn something about the language and to allow teachers to diagnose where students are having difficulty.

Beth introduces her topic by summarising the importance of listening. Research shows that students spend up to 50% of their time listening in L2 lessons. Listening is hard, it's not passive and it causes anxiety when it's perceived by students as hard. For many years we neglected the teaching of listening, but in recent years its value has been more recognised. How can we make it more enjoyable and successful?

For teaching listening to be balanced, Beth proposes a model of four types of listening instruction:

1. Language-focused tasks – focus on specific linguistic aspects, e.g. phonemes, vocabulary, chunks and grammar.
2. Meaning-focused – comprehension questions and much more.
3. Strategy-building listening – learning how to cope with listening.
4. Fluency-growing listening - easy listening to build proficiency.

Many teachers report that they usually emphasise the second of those categories, meaning-focused listening. Do you? Beth suggests that we would do well to focus more on the other three areas - my impression is that she particularly values the first. 

In this post I'll deal with this first area, language-focused listening:

Language-focused listening

Take the following utterance:

"For the next 30 days"

You can analyse this in terms of its phonemes/syllables, its words/chunks, its syntax and its intonation. Language-focused tasks could focus on each of these four areas. Here are some ways of doing this:

1. Dictation

Not traditional set-piece dictation, but building in dictation to a range of activities. She recommends dictating at normal speed, varying difficulty by choice of language and length of utterance. Before tackling a listening you review key words by dictating them in easy contexts. You can practise difficult sounds. Spelling and punctuation don’t matter for this, she says. Focus problem areas for students, e.g. tricky vowel sounds in French.

2. Repetition

Repetition is often thought of as a speaking task, but it involves listening. It's possible to repeat short chunks (e.g. four syllables) without knowing the meaning of what you are hearing, but with longer chunks you need to know the meaning to repeat successfully. Do repetition to focus, for instance,  on tricky words in the listening passage or intonation patterns. Do some repetition at the pre-listening stage.

3. Anticipation activities

Stop reading mid-sentence (or even mid-word) to get students to focus on a problem area (vocab, syntax or sounds). Students can write down the rest of the sentence and feed back to the teacher or discuss what might follow in groups/pairs. As a pre-listening task you could get students to complete sentence starters relevant to the passage in question, e.g.

Try it for the next 30... (days? hours? weeks/)
Think about something you've.... (always.../never.../ often.../past participle)

4. Language spotting

"Raise your hand when you hear the word ______." (vocab spotting)
"Write down every word you hear that begins with “f”." (phoneme spotting)
"Write down all the past tense verbs you hear." (grammar-based)
"Circle the key points in the transcript which the speaker makes." (meaning focused – how is emphasis achieved)

5. Transcript correction

This is familiar to most teachers and involves, for example, gap-filling or correcting errors. Beth reminds us that gaps should have a purpose, e.g. grammatical, morphological or phonemic. 

6. "Tiny questions"

This is when you take a sentence from the passage and ask questions based on it. The students may have to infer answers from the vocabulary or grammar used.

Note that in all of these examples there is an intensive focus on the detail of the listening text and that tasks may involve some interactivity with fellow students or the teacher.

For more "micro-listening" activities similar to the above I suggest you have a look at Gianfranco Conti's blogs, e.g. here. I can also recommend using the webinar as part of departmental development. Teachers should find it interesting and very useful.

In the nest post I'll summarise what Beth says about the other three areas of listening instruction.


Popular posts from this blog

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning.

Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words, …

Using sentence builder frames for GCSE speaking and writing preparation

Some teachers have cottoned on to the fact that sentence builders (aka substitution tables) are a very useful tool for helping students prepare for their GCSE speaking and writing tests. My own hunch is that would help for students of all levels of proficiency, but may be particularly helpful for those likely to get lower grades, say between 3-6. Much depends, of course, on how complex you make the table.

To remind you, here is a typical sentence builder, as found on the frenchteacher site. The topic is talking about where you live. A word of warning - formatting blogs in Blogger is a nightmare when you start with Word documents, so apologies for any issues. It might have taken me another 30 minutes just to sort out the html code underlying the original document.

Setting work for home study

A major challenge for language teachers just now is selecting and sharing work with students to do at home. Here a few suggestions on the issue to add to your own. The sites I mention are the tip of the iceberg and focus mainly on French. I have stuck to free resources, not subscription sites.

By the way, I'm not getting into the use of tech here, as I have no great expertise on that. In any case, I imagine for younger learners especially it may be a question of setting other types of work.


For advanced learners the job is not so tough. There is a plethora of listening, reading and grammar material they can use, whether it be from their textbooks, other resources shared electronically or online resources. You may have your favourites, but for a selection for French you can check out my links here and here. You may want to stick with topics on the syllabus, or free up students to read and listen more generally to what interests them.

One idea I used was to ask students to c…

Filling the gaps

All teachers at some time make use of gap-fill activities. There are very good reasons for doing so, whether the focus is on careful listening with a transcript, grammatical awareness, vocabulary retrieval or general comprehension. I particularly liked them for scaffolding listening with classes, combining comprehension with phonics and grammar. A gap-fill really gets students listening intensively and supports the process of listening. If you are keen on the idea of Listening as Modelling (as described in our listening book) you may prefer this type of task to general comprehension exercises which can end up promoting guesswork.

You can use gap-full in all kinds of ways and with different aims in mind. As a little exercise I thought I’d make a list if all the types of gap-fill I could think of.  These are all with LISTENING in mind, more than reading. These could help you focus on the precise aim of the gap-fill or just provide you with some variations to make it more interesting for…