Skip to main content

Grammar and communication are not mutually exclusive

I never quite understood the dichotomy of grammar and communication.

I was taught using the London University style question-answer method, a type of structured direct method, if you will, where grammar remained at the heart of everything, but was presented and practised through the target language. There was communication albeit of an artificial nature, but as a method you could say that it works pretty well, at least with above average aptitude students. It can be adapted, watered down maybe, for children of lower ability.

I was reminded of this when reading a useful article by Martine Pillette from the May 2013 edition of the ALL Francophonie journal. She takes as her theme Grammar and Communication: Friends not Foes. Her piece includes types of activity which resemble many of the activities I and my colleagues did over the years with classes (activities which, by the way, take very little preparation).

Here are some activities which combine grammatical  with communicative practice from Martine's list. I have copied and pasted them directly, then added a few of my own. I commend them strongly to you.

For mainly listening purposes:
  • Negatives – The teacher says a sentence and pupils must work out whether it is affirmative or negative;
  • Adverbs – The teacher says a sentence and pupils must identify the adverbs in it;
  • Comparatives – The teacher says a comparative sentence (e.g. ‘Lady Gaga est plus jeune que Madonna’) and pupils must decide whether it is true or not;
  • Identifying time sequences – The teacher says a sentence and pupils must decide whether it refers to the past, the present or the future;
  • Recognising conjugated verbs – The teacher says a sentence containing a conjugated verb (e.g. ‘La semaine dernière, j’ai vu mon acteur préféré dans la rue’) and pupils must show that they recognise the verb by saying: ‘J’ai vu, du verbe voir’, ‘to see’.
And now here are a few examples for speaking purposes:
  • Negatives – The teacher says an affirmative sentence and pupils must repeat it in the negative;
  • Tenses – The teacher says a sentence in the present tense and pupils must repeat it in the future tense;
  • Verb paradigms – The teacher says a sentence in the first person singular and pupils must repeat it in the first person plural;
  • Questions – The teacher makes a statement (e.g. ‘Vous allez partir en Espagne’) and points at a question word (e.g. ‘Quand’). Pupils must turn the teacher’s sentence into a question beginning with ‘Quand’ – using ‘est-ce que’ or inversion depending on which form is being practised. 
Here are a few more:
  •  The teacher gives a simple statement and asks the class to come up with as many questions as possible which would produce that answer;
  •  The teacher gives a sentence and pupils have to come back with a new sentence with just one element changed;
  • The teacher begins a sentence and the pupils have to complete it with something appropriate;
  • The teacher gives the end of a sentence and the pupils have to complete it with an appropriate start;
  • The teacher gives a sentence in the present tense, then says; "passé" or "future" and pupils have to adapt the sentence accordingly
  • The teacher utters a sentence leaving a gap where the verb should be. the pupils have to complete the sentence with an appropriate verb
By the way, some fans of "comprehensible input" approaches may object to this general approach, claiming that it is too focused on form, not enough on meaning. I would argue that this is only one part of a teacher's arsenal of techniques, but one which has been well road-tested over the years.

Happy grammatical communicating!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Designing a plan to improve listening skills

Read many books and articles about listening and you’ll see it described as the forgotten skill. It certainly seems to be the one which causes anxiety for both teachers and students. The reasons are clear: you only get a very few chances to hear the material, exercises feel like tests and listening is, well, hard. Just think of the complex processes involved: segmenting the sound stream, knowing lots of words and phrases, using grammatical knowledge to make meaning, coping with a new sound system and more. Add to this the fact that in England they have recently decided to make listening tests harder (too hard) and many teachers are wondering what else they can do to help their classes.

For students to become good listeners takes lots of time and practice, so there are no quick fixes. However, I’m going to suggest, very concisely, what principles could be the basis of an overall plan of action. These could be the basis of a useful departmental discussion or day-to-day chats about meth…

Five great advanced level French listening sites

If your A-level students would like opportunities to practise listening there are plenty of sources you can recommend for accessible, largely comprehensible and interesting material. Here are some I have come across while searching for resources over recent years.

Daily Geek Show

I love this site. It's fresh, youthful and full of really interesting material. They have an archive of videos, both short and long, from various sources, grouped under a range of themes: insolite (weird news items), science, discovery, technology, ecology and lifestyle. There should be something there to interest all your students while adding to their broader education. Here is one I enjoyed (I shall seriously think about buying tomatoes in winter now):




France Bienvenue

This site has been around for years and is the work of a university team in Marseilles. You get a mixture of audio and video material complete with transcripts and explanations.This is much more about the personal lives of the students …

Responsive teaching

Dylan Wiliam, the academic most associated with Assessment for Learning (AfL), aka formative assessment, has stated that these labels have not been the most helpful to teachers. He believes that they have been partly responsible for poor implementation of AfL and the fact that AfL has not led to the improved outcomes originally intended.

Wiliam wrote on Twitter in 2013:

“Example of really big mistake: calling formative assessment formative assessment rather than something like "responsive teaching".”

For the record he subsequently added:

“The point I was making—years ago now—is that it would have been much easier if we had called formative assessment "responsive teaching". However, I now realize that this wouldn't have helped since it would have given many people the idea that it was all about the teacher's role.”

I suspect he’s right about the appellation and its consequences. As a teacher I found it hard to get my head around the terms AfL and formative assess…