Skip to main content

Comprehensible input on frenchteacher

I'm one of those teachers, like most I would think, who place a high value on providing what Stephen Krashen christened "comprehensible input". That's why I always wanted to teach primarily through the target language with a strong emphasis on listening and reading for meaning. As a child taught in the 1960s and 70s I also value the "skill-building" approach and as a teacher was happy to do lots of target language structured practice, occasional translation and some explanation.

My website reflects both of those strands, with numerous grammar practice sheets and some grammar explanation handouts, but in fact the bulk of the resources are there to provide meaningful language through texts and listening. The staple resources are articles with exercises and video listening from authentic sources.

With comprehensible input and reading for interest in mind I began last year putting together a set of parallel reading resources for beginners and near beginners which I know many teachers have used. Reading material can, of course, be read aloud to provide useful listening.

So, on the Primary/Year 7 page of frenchteacher.net I have a good range of short texts laid out in landscape format, with French on the left, English on the right. To make them exploitable they come with a range of simple exercises and vocabulary lists to complete. The exercise types still focus on reading rather than writing - true/false, or true/false/not mentioned and ticking correct sentences (all in French) are the exercise types I use most since they provide even more input.

These are the topics covered: the Eiffel Tower, Channel Tunnel, meerkats, kangaroos, whale, sharks, spiders, ladybirds, dolphins, tigers, vampires, my dog, my family, my house, Cinderella, becoming a vet, Brazil, my friend, my mum, my family, planets, a weather forecast, a simple poem, the boy who cried wolf story and asking directions.

I could envisage these being used as a change from the usual work when you want a filler lesson. There is no grammatical focus, it's all about meaning. With stronger classes you could even use them without the English translation.

I have also posted a cover/front page in case teachers wish to make a booklet of the texts for their classes. This could be for extension work, for example.

If used in class with the whole group, I would read them aloud while the class follows and glances across at the English. With the right classes I would get them to read aloud to the class or in pairs. They could then work on the exercises in silence. At a later stage you could get pupils to fold the sheet in half and try translating back without reference to the English text provided. I'm sure you could come up with other ways to exploit the texts.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,