Skip to main content

So what about that Conservative Ebacc commitment?

Update 14.6.15 - now looks like Ebacc will be introduced in full, including GCSE MFL for all, but with first teaching from September 2018.

*******************************************************************************

We will require secondary school pupils to take GCSEs in English, maths, science, a language and history or geography, with Ofsted unable to award its highest ratings to schools that refuse to teach these core subjects.

Conservative manifesto



Given that education barely featured in the election campaign, it's not surprising, perhaps, that this pledge went somewhat under the radar. Needless to say, it has huge ramifications for languages and for school accountability as a whole.

First question: should the government be able to tell Ofsted on what basis they can award grades? It would appear to seriously compromise Ofsted's independence.

Next, with regard to languages, this represents a volte face for the Conservatives. Since languages became optional under Labour, the Conservatives have always resisted the idea of making them compulsory once more. The Ebacc accountability measure certainly bribed schools in the direction of languages and triggered a slightly greater take-up at GCSE, but there was no indication that languages may become compulsory once more.

But let's look at that manifesto pledge more closely.

They say We will require secondary school pupils. I notice they do not say ALL secondary school students. Am I nit-picking?

Next, are we to presume that the statement applies to all schools, including free schools and academies? After all, the national curriculum currently does not. Would we be in the absurd situation of maintained schools having compulsory languages, while academies and frees do not? Could this mean - and I am stretching the argument to its limit here - that this would be an incitement to schools to academise?

The statement about Ofsted grading also suggests that schools may choose to refuse to apply the policy. Does this mean free schools and academies, or all schools?

The phrase "core subjects" is used. Do they mean "core" in the technical sense? This would be new for languages and give them equal status to maths, English and science.

Or, is this pledge really saying that the government accepts many schools will choose not to enforce compulsory languages and humanities and that, as before, the accountability regime will, penalise schools who make that choice, not just by a lower Ebacc score, but a lower overall school rating?

What if they really do mean that all schools must make languages compulsory for all at KS4? This has serious implications with regard to teacher supply. After 2004, many language teachers dropped out of the profession and we are now in a situation where language teacher supply is problematic. If schools were all to reintroduce compulsory languages at KS4 there would not be enough teachers.

Furthermore, we would be back to a situation where many pupils, unable to cope with the demands of (a toughened) GCSE would struggle in the classroom, achieve little and cause problems. Add to this the fact that the government allowed a valid alternative to GCSE to wither (Asset Languages) and seems to undervalue vocational language qualifications, we are potentially left with a real mess.

Let us see how this unfolds. Will realities hit home and will the government quietly abandon their Ebacc pledge?

Comments

  1. Hi Steve - will probably comment on the forum as well, but you raise some very interesting and excellent points. Do we know what the lovely Ms Morgan's view is on MFL? I look forward to being appreciated as a linguist again, should there be mad rush to entice us all back into the fold!

    Keep up the sterling work in the meantime.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi. Thanks for leaving a comment. No, I haven't heard Nicky Morgan say much about languages. I'm a little surprised language teachers have not picked up on this manifesto commitment. Surely teachers read the Tory manifesto!?

    ReplyDelete

Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning.

Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words, …

Using sentence builder frames for GCSE speaking and writing preparation

Some teachers have cottoned on to the fact that sentence builders (aka substitution tables) are a very useful tool for helping students prepare for their GCSE speaking and writing tests. My own hunch is that would help for students of all levels of proficiency, but may be particularly helpful for those likely to get lower grades, say between 3-6. Much depends, of course, on how complex you make the table.

To remind you, here is a typical sentence builder, as found on the frenchteacher site. The topic is talking about where you live. A word of warning - formatting blogs in Blogger is a nightmare when you start with Word documents, so apologies for any issues. It might have taken me another 30 minutes just to sort out the html code underlying the original document.


Setting work for home study

A major challenge for language teachers just now is selecting and sharing work with students to do at home. Here a few suggestions on the issue to add to your own. The sites I mention are the tip of the iceberg and focus mainly on French. I have stuck to free resources, not subscription sites.

By the way, I'm not getting into the use of tech here, as I have no great expertise on that. In any case, I imagine for younger learners especially it may be a question of setting other types of work.

ADVANCED

For advanced learners the job is not so tough. There is a plethora of listening, reading and grammar material they can use, whether it be from their textbooks, other resources shared electronically or online resources. You may have your favourites, but for a selection for French you can check out my links here and here. You may want to stick with topics on the syllabus, or free up students to read and listen more generally to what interests them.

One idea I used was to ask students to c…

Filling the gaps

All teachers at some time make use of gap-fill activities. There are very good reasons for doing so, whether the focus is on careful listening with a transcript, grammatical awareness, vocabulary retrieval or general comprehension. I particularly liked them for scaffolding listening with classes, combining comprehension with phonics and grammar. A gap-fill really gets students listening intensively and supports the process of listening. If you are keen on the idea of Listening as Modelling (as described in our listening book) you may prefer this type of task to general comprehension exercises which can end up promoting guesswork.

You can use gap-full in all kinds of ways and with different aims in mind. As a little exercise I thought I’d make a list if all the types of gap-fill I could think of.  These are all with LISTENING in mind, more than reading. These could help you focus on the precise aim of the gap-fill or just provide you with some variations to make it more interesting for…