Skip to main content

Gojimo

Gojimo is an education app for Apple and Android devices. It offers some language learning material for French, German and Spanish. So far it has some exercises for GCSE level, categorised by the areas vocabulary, grammar, reading and writing. Exercises are also broken down by exam board and by a few topic areas.

The app, like others, gives you right/wrong feedback with some explanation. It also keeps your score and progress. Navigation is clear, presentation sober - a bit dull, to be honest.

The vocabulary tasks are simple one word translations, grammar consists of conjugation/translation at a verb only level. Writing involves sentence level translation both ways. You don't type out any answers, just choose from a list. All of these tasks are pretty dull and similar to ones found on other apps of this type.

The reading tasks are better. Each one has a short, accurate passage followed by a series of multi-choice questions in English. The textual content is uninteresting, but at least these tasks work at something beyond word or sentence level.

I find this app hard to recommend as it stands. Exercise types are dull and predictable, material limited for languages (apparently more extensive for other subjects). Some listening content would be welcome. Like other apps of this type it may suit some students who are motivated by working at word and phrase level, but like other apps the algorithm which scores and records a student's progress is so far not matched by the quality of the content. The stress is, alas, very much on getting better exam results rather than inspiring any real interest in the subject.

I have yet to come across a killer content/input-based app for languages and would love to hear of one. What we need will not come free, but I'm sure there is room in the market for a low cost MFL app with high quality interactive reading and listening content.







- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad


Comments

  1. Steve, thanks for sharing your thoughts on Gojimo. We'd never intended Gojimo to be a revision tool for languages. Like you, we didn't feel our current assessment mechanisms serves languages particularly well - it's better for subjects like Science or History. However, so many students ended up asking for languages that we didn't feel we could ignore their requests any longer.

    We've been discussing your post this afternoon as a team and you'll be pleased to know many of the suggestions you've made are already in the product pipeline. Hopefully in the long run we can make Gojimo an extremely effective tool for language learners!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for commenting.. I understand what you say about the effectiveness for different subjects. MFL is quite hard to do well and to do it really well takes a big investment.. Good luck with your future development. There is room for good app resources for languages, ones which get beyond basic vocab recognition and verb conjugation which are well served elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,