Skip to main content

Environment resources on frenchteacher

Image: pixabay.com


I thought it was a great shame when the exam boards in England decided to drop the environment from their A-level specifications. Their argument was that it was hard to make the topic fit with the DfE's aim of making topics firmly rooted in the target language culture. They must have thought Ofqual wouldn't wear it. Of note is that the topic still appears in AQA's GCSE specification, as part of the global issues theme.


Maybe it was a marginal decision, but I don't see why teachers couldn't relate environmental issues to individual countries. Just think of France and the areas where the topic could have been worked in:  the use of pesticides in farming, organic food, nuclear energy policy, banning glyphosate weed killers (Roundup), renewable energy, air and water pollution, biodiversity, the growth of solar, electric vehicle production.

At one meeting I led for AQA a dismayed teacher made the point very strongly that the number one issue facing the planet, man-made global warming, could have found its way into specifications. I agree. The "get-out clause" is that students can, in the specification, choose an environmental topic as their individual research project, and perhaps some teachers might encourage A-level students in that direction. It begs the question, for me a least: if you can do an environmental topic for an IRP, why not build it into the syllabus?

Perhaps, ultimately, the exam boards reflect society's general ostrich-like ambivalence about the topic, as well as the view from some teachers that the environment is just "boring".

 If I were still teaching I would still happily do some work on global warming, even if it did not relate specifically to France. It's too important not to talk about. As I have blogged previously, teachers should not be too enslaved to the syllabus - get students to communicate about all kinds of issues which are important and/or of interest to them.

Well, it's still on the specification for one more year at A2 and here is a list of the resources I have on frenchteacher.net in August 2016:

  • 2015, the hottest year in history (new resource, August 2016)
  • Paris climate change agreement 2015 
  • State of the French environment in 2015 
  • 5 things we learn from the 2013 IPCC report 
  • Acidification of the oceans 
  • Climate change - French-Eng summary 
  • Climate change - Eng - French summary 
  • Climate change - effects of a +4 degrees temperature rise by 2060 
  • CO2 exceeds 400 ppm in May 2013 
  • Rain forests and global warming
  • Deforestation and reforestation 
  • Carbon gas levels 
  • Men and women - carbon footprint 
  • Pollution from air travel 
  •  Deaths from air pollution 
  • Solar energy 
  • Starter activity on energy 
  • Nuclear energy 
  • Nuclear energy - for and against 
  • Wind turbines - for or against

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics
5 comments
Read more

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,
1 comment
Read more