Skip to main content

In defence of drills

There was a time when repetitive drilling was all the rage in language classrooms. If you read Wilga Rivers’ chunky handbook Teaching Foreign Language Skills (various editions from 1968 to 1981), you’ll discover a detailed classification of drill types. Rivers was writing towards the end of the audio-lingual era before communicative language teaching began to exert its huge influence. Audio-lingualism, influenced by behaviourist psychology, assumed that by repeating language over and over again it would become “stamped in”, internalised to be readily available when it was required in an unrehearsed context. It’s not too far-fetched to liken it to more modern skill-acquisition theories which argue that language can become “automatised” through repetitive practice.

In some circles drilling is now considered a dirty word - “drill and kill”, is how some put it. But while I can agree that drilling may have been overdone in the past (think of Longmans Audio-Visual French), you can easily make a case for including repetitive drills as part of your repertoire of interactions.

Take this typical transformation drill (taking a prompt sentence then changing it in one or more ways to create a new sentence):

1. Aujourd’hui je joue au football.​(Hier j’ai joué…)

2. Aujourd’hui je voyage en train.

3. Aujourd’hui je finis mes devoirs.​

4. Aujourd’hui je choisis un biscuit.​

5. Aujourd’hui je vends mon vélo.

6. Aujourd’hui je perds mon portable.

7. Aujourd’hui il écoute le prof.

8. Aujourd’hui elle chante dans la chorale.

9. Aujourd’hui on finit à trois heures trente.

10. Aujourd’hui nous dansons dans la rue.

11. Aujourd’hui il rend son devoir au prof.

12. Aujourd’hui tu manges à la cantine.

13. Aujourd’hui vous perdez du temps.

14. Aujourd’hui ils choisissent un hamburger.

15. Aujourd’hui elle regarde un bon film.

16. Aujourd’hui nous achetons un nouveau livre.

17. Aujourd’hui vous parlez français.

18. Aujourd’hui je discute avec mon copain.

19. Aujourd’hui il remplit un formulaire.

20. Aujourd’hui tu finis le dîner à sept heures.

If you look at example (1) you’ll see that the point of the drill is to practice using the perfect tense with regular “avoir” verbs. You could do this as part of a lesson plan, as a starter or plenary to a lesson. It is reasonably challenging because the subject pronoun changes so more thought is needed when producing the verb form in the response. You can design much simpler drills.

Why is it a useful activity?

a. It provides highly patterned comprehensible input, albeit not of a highly interesting type.
b. The exercise is very structured, which appeals to students who wish to know exactly what they have to do in a lesson.
c. The drill is adaptable and can have in-built progression, e.g. pupils can just change the verb tense, or change both the tense and the object, or even change the tense, object and add further elements, for example an adverbial expression.
d. Students are required to think through how they form the perfect tense in their answer. Most teachers believe that this quick thought process helps students internalise the rules of the language for more creative use on subsequent occasions. (This is of course hotly debated in the research literature.)
e. Once the drill is done orally it can be written down for further reinforcement.
f. The drill helps build listening skill in various ways, e.g. are constantly making sound-spelling links if they have the prompts in front of them.
g. The drill can be done in pairs and groups once it has been modelled.
h. By focusing on the verb form and accompanying it with simple, previously taught vocabulary you lower the cognitive load on students.

It is of course easy to find fault with such exercises like these. You could say that they lack meaningful communication or that they are too focused on grammatical form. But I would say in response that repetitive drills of this type are just one, very useful element in a much broader diet of classroom activities. As I mentioned, they make for great starters if you want to get the whole class’s attention from the beginning of the lesson. They are a great way of staying in the target language and they guarantee many repetitions of key structures. Imagine spending 10-15 minutes on this compared with doing a vocab test, using a vocab app or listening to an audio recording for gist. Which might give students the best “return on investment” in terms of gaining proficiency?

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad


Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

A zero preparation fluency game

I am grateful to Kayleigh Meyrick, a teacher in Sheffield, for this game which she described in the Languages Today magazine (January, 2018). She called it “Swap It/Add It” and it’s dead simple! I’ve added my own little twist as well as a justification for the activity.

You could use this at almost any level, even advanced level where the language could get a good deal more sophisticated.

Put students into small groups or pairs. If in groups you can have them stand in circles to add a sense of occasion. One student utters a sentence, e.g. “J’aime jouer au foot avec mes copains parce que c’est amusant.” (You could provide the starter sentence or let groups make up their own.) The next student (or partner) has to change one element in the sentence, and so on, until you restart with a different sentence. You could give a time limit of, say, 2 minutes. The sentence could easily relate to the topic you are working on. At advanced level a suitable sentence starter might be:

“Selon un article q…

Google Translate beaters

Google Translate is a really useful tool, but some teachers say that they have stopped setting written work to be done at home because students are cheating by using it. On a number of occasions I have seen teachers asking what tasks can be set which make the use of Google Translate hard or impossible. Having given this some thought I have come up with one possible Google Translate-beating task type. It's a two way gapped translation exercise where students have to complete gaps in two parallel texts, one in French, one in English. There are no complete sentences which can be copied and pasted into Google.

This is what one looks like. Remember to hand out both texts at the same time.


_____. My name is David. _ __ 15 years old and I live in Ripon, a _____ ____ in the north of _______, near York. I have two _______ and one brother. My brother __ ______ David and my _______ are called Erika and Claire. We live in a _____ house in the centre of ____. In ___ house _____ …

Dissecting a lesson: using a set of PowerPoint slides

I was prompted to write this just having produced for three separate PowerPoint presentations using the same set of 20 pictures (sports). A very good way for you to save time is to reuse the same resource in a number of different ways.

I chose 20 clear, simple, clear and copyright-free images from to produce three presentations on present tense (beginners), near future (post beginner) and perfect tense (post-beginner/low intermediate). Here is one of them:

Below is how I would have taught using this presentation - it won't be everyone's cup of tea, especially of you are not big on choral repetition and PPP (Presentation-Practice-Production), but I'll justify my choice in the plan at each stage. For some readers this will be standard practice.

1. Explain in English that you are going to teach the class how to talk about and understand people talking about sport. By the end of the lesson they will be able to say and understand 20 different sport…

Designing a plan to improve listening skills

Read many books and articles about listening and you’ll see it described as the forgotten skill. It certainly seems to be the one which causes anxiety for both teachers and students. The reasons are clear: you only get a very few chances to hear the material, exercises feel like tests and listening is, well, hard. Just think of the complex processes involved: segmenting the sound stream, knowing lots of words and phrases, using grammatical knowledge to make meaning, coping with a new sound system and more. Add to this the fact that in England they have recently decided to make listening tests harder (too hard) and many teachers are wondering what else they can do to help their classes.

For students to become good listeners takes lots of time and practice, so there are no quick fixes. However, I’m going to suggest, very concisely, what principles could be the basis of an overall plan of action. These could be the basis of a useful departmental discussion or day-to-day chats about meth…